Table 2.

Intervention effects on index participant engagement in cervical cancer (CC) prevention advocacy, and related outcomes, at month 6, controlling for baseline levels of the outcome and background characteristics

Outcome	Baseline			Month 6
	Control (n = 20)	Intervention (n = 20)	p	Control (n = 19)	Intervention (n = 20)	p	Beta (SE); p*
Sharing of CC screening result with others	1.47 (0.62)	1.62 (0.39)	0.37	1.58 (0.48)	1.93 (0.21)	0.006	0.22 (0.10); 0.045
% alters who know the index participant’s CC screening result	91.5% (23.1)	87.8% (24.5)	0.62	94.2% (18.2)	100% (0)	0.17	0.06 (0.03); 0.09
CC knowledge	8.55 (2.80)	10.05 (3.36)	0.13	8.50 (2.37)	15.70 (0.66)	< 0.001	7.00 (0.60); <0.001
CC internalized stigma	1.21 (0.35)	1.07 (0.16)	0.12	1.08 (0.29)	1.00 (0.00)	0.13	-0.01 (0.04); 0.77
CC health services utilization self-efficacy	8.70 (1.40)	8.85 (1.28)	0.73	7.40 (2.16)	10.00 (0.00)	< 0.001	2.56 (0.50); <0.001
CC prevention advocacy self-efficacy	9.75 (0.46)	9.72 (0.49)	0.83	8.15 (1.98)	10.00 (0.00)	< 0.001	1.97 (0.45); <0.001
CC prevention advocacy	3.23 (1.13)	3.57 (1.16)	0.35	2.90 (1.10)	4.98 (0.11)	< 0.001	1.84 (0.22); <0.001
CC screening advocacy across all alters (reported by index)	1.96 (0.19)	1.85 (0.51)	0.39	2.03 (0.06)	2.19 (0.21)	0.004	0.17 (0.05); 0.001
CC screening advocacy across all alters (reported by enrolled alters)	2.00 (0.00)	2.03 (0.10)	0.16	1.97 (0.27)	2.26 (0.31)	0.006	0.33 (0.11); 0.005

* Coefficient for main effect of the intervention, from linear regression model with the outcome measure at month 6 as the dependent variable, and independent variables being the baseline measure of the outcome, treatment condition (intervention or control), and background characteristic covariates (age, secondary education, whether index had a main sex partner, HIV status)

SE = standard error