Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;13(43):30293–30305. doi: 10.1039/d3ra06327e

Comparing the efficiency of Fe3O4@SiO2-[CuL] with some reported catalysts for synthesis of 3m from the reaction between imidazole and iodobenzene.

graphic file with name d3ra06327e-u19.jpg
Entry (ref.) Catalyst Conditions Time (h) Yield (%)
1 (ref. 47) Cu2O (10 mol%) DMSO, KOH, 110 °C 24 90
2 (ref. 48) Cu–Y zeolite (10.8 mol%) DMF, K2CO3, 120 °C 24 99
3 (ref. 49) CuFAP (12.5 mol%) DMSO, K2CO3, 110 °C 6 92
4 (ref. 50) Nano-CuO (2.5 mol%) DMSO, KOH, 110 °C 24 91
5 (ref. 51) SiO2-Py-Cu(OAc)2 (5 mol%) Toluene, Cs2CO3, 100 °C 8 92
6 (ref. 37) Fe3O4@SiO2-PVA-Cu(ii) (0.6 mol%) DMF, t-BuONa, 100 °C 5 94
7 (this work) Fe3O4@SiO2-[CuL] (1 mol%) DMF, Cs2CO3, 110 °C 5 93