Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 21;26(1):e300719. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300719

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons in the UKB test set and WHII validation sample to survive FDR corrections

Risk score 1 AUC for risk score 1 Risk score 2 AUC for risk score 2 P Pcorr
UKB
 UKBDRS 0.80 Age only 0.77 9.54×10-6 9.54×10-6
 UKBDRS 0.80 ANU-ADRI 0.57 2.62×10-62 1.05×10-61
 UKBDRS 0.80 CAIDE 0.60 2.23×10-42 4.45×10-42
 UKBDRS 0.80 DRS 0.77 5.64×10-7 7.53×10-7
WHII
 UKBDRS 0.77 Age only 0.74 3.20×10-3 5.97×10-3
 UKBDRS 0.77 ANU-ADRI 0.52 8.16×10-11 3.27×10-10
 UKBDRS 0.77 CAIDE 0.69 4.48×10-3 5.97×10-3
 UKBDRS 0.77 DRS 0.74 1.07×10-2 1.07×10-2

The AUC of the UKBDRS was compared with each external risk score and an age-only model. If a comparison is not shown, there was no statistical difference in performance.

ANU-ADRI, Australian National University Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Index; AUC, area under the curve; CAIDE, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia; DRS, Dementia Risk Score; FDR, false discovery rate; UKB, UK Biobank; UKBDRS, UK Biobank Dementia Risk Score; WHII, Whitehall II.