Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;55:71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00847-6

Table 3.

Correlations between the GEBV from the different models for four traits

Models compared Live weight Hip height BCS Heifer puberty
Correlation
BREEDFIXED – BREEDRANDOM 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.98
BREEDFIXED – NOBREED 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.97
BREEDFIXED – BAYESR 0.93 0.90 0.92 0.95
BREEDRANDOM – NOBREED 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
BREEDRANDOM – BAYESR 0.97 0.95 0.98 0.98
NOBREED – BAYESR 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.98
Regression (first model GEBV on second model GEBV)
BREEDFIXED – BREEDRANDOM 1.21 1.01 1.06 1.20
BREEDFIXED – NOBREED 1.21 1.00 1.06 1.21
BREEDFIXED – BAYESR 1.21 1.02 1.01 1.20
BREEDRANDOM – NOBREED 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.02
BREEDRANDOM – BAYESR 1.01 1.03 0.97 1.00
NOBREED – BAYESR 1.00 1.01 0.96 0.99

Standard errors for the correlations are 0.006, using Fischer’s approximation of 1/√(n-3)

BCS = body condition score