Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;13:21. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4

Table 2.

GRADE assessment: supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise

Supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise for patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation
Patient or population: patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation
Setting: Hospital
Intervention: supervised exercise
Comparison: non-supervised exercise
Outcomes № of participants studies) Follow-up Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with nonsupervised exercise Risk difference with supervised exercise

Pain assessed with: Visual Analogue Scale (cm)

Scale from: 0 to 10 follow-up: mean 4 months

250 (5 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯

Lowa,b

- MD 1.14 lower (1.65 lower to 0.62 lower)
Disability follow-up: mean 4 months 175 (4 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯

Lowb,c

- - SMD 0.7 SD Lower (1.14 lower to 0.26 lower)
Lumbar Mobility assessed with: Schober Test (cm) follow-up: mean 3 months 68 (2 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯

Lowb,d

- MD 0.27 lower (0.7 lower to 0.16 higher)

CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, SMD standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Explanations

a3 of 5 studies are at high risk of bias

bN<400

c2 of 4 studies at high risk of bias

d2 of 3 studies at high risk of bias