Table 3.
GRADE assessment: supervised exercise compared to advice
Supervised exercise compared to advice for patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation Patient or population: patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation Setting: Hospital Intervention: supervised exercise Comparison: advice | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcomes | № of participants studies) Follow-up |
Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) |
Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects | |
Risk with advised | Risk difference with Supervised exercise | ||||
Pain follow up: mean 4 months | 341 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯◯ Very lowa,b,c |
- | - |
SMD 0.91 SD lower (1.61 lower to 0.21 lower) |
Disability follow-up: mean 4 months | 261 (4 RCTs) |
⨁◯◯◯ Very lowb,c,d |
- | - |
SMD 0.8 SD lower (1.59 lower to 0.01 lower) |
CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, SMD standardised mean difference
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Explanations
a2 studies at high risk and 2 studies with some concerns
bhigh heterogeneity
cn<400
d2 studies at high risk, 1 study with some concerns