Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;13:21. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4

Table 3.

GRADE assessment: supervised exercise compared to advice

Supervised exercise compared to advice for patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation
Patient or population: patients after surgery for lumbar disk herniation
Setting: Hospital
Intervention: supervised exercise
Comparison: advice
Outcomes № of participants
studies) Follow-up
Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)
Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with advised Risk difference with Supervised exercise
Pain follow up: mean 4 months 341 (5 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯◯

Very lowa,b,c

- -

SMD 0.91 SD

lower

(1.61 lower to

0.21 lower)

Disability follow-up: mean 4 months 261 (4 RCTs)

⨁◯◯◯

Very lowb,c,d

- -

SMD 0.8 SD

lower

(1.59 lower to

0.01 lower)

CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, SMD standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Explanations

a2 studies at high risk and 2 studies with some concerns

bhigh heterogeneity

cn<400

d2 studies at high risk, 1 study with some concerns