Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 21;49:e20223259. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223259-en

Table 3. Comparison of data related to extraperitoneal pelvic tamponade, external fixation, and arteriography between the groups of survivors and non-survivors.

Survivors Non-survivors p
Extraperitoneal tamponade
Time between admission and EPP, min 144 (±118.8) 131 (±82.6) 0.64
Surgical packs, n 8 [3-14] 8 [4-12] 0.528
Patients, n 22 29
External fixation
Patients undergoing EF, n (%) 19 (86.36) 23 (79.31) 0.713
Patients, n 22 29
Time between EPP and EF, min 20 [5-305] 20 [5-120] 0.47
Patients, n 17 20
Arteriography
AR indication, n (%) 16 (72.72) 25 (86.2) 0.286
Arterial contrast extravasation on CT, n (%) 3 (13.63) 5 (17.24) 1
Refractory shock, n (%) 13 (59.09) 20 (68.96) 0.465
Patients, n 22 29
Arteriography performed 10 (45.45) 10 (34.48) 0.61
Patients, n 22 29
Time between EPP and AR, min 195 [90-1185] 150 [40-860] 0.693
Patients, n 10 10
Presence of arterial injury 3 (30) 5 (50) 0.65
Embolization 4 (40) 4 (50) 1
Patients, n 10 10

: refractory shock after EPP (and external fixation of the pelvis, when performed); AR: arteriography; CT: computed tomography; EF: external fixation of the pelvis; EPP: extraperitoneal pelvis tamponade; n: number of patients.