Table 2. Summary of the studies on the impact of SMPs on uptakes of non-COVID-19 vaccines.
No. | Region | Study population | Author | No. of participants | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Israel | Parents in Israel with at least one child older than two years of age with no chronic illness and no history of measles. | Ashkenazi et al.54 | 399 | Internet and SMPs were the primary sources of information for one-third of respondents regarding measles/measles vaccine and half the respondents regarding the measles outbreak; SMPs were negatively associated with the correct knowledge. |
2 | Pakistan | - | Ittefaq et al.56 | - | Pakistan’s polio eradication program faces many challenges; propaganda campaigns on SMPs resulted in an upsurge in the active number of new polio cases. |
3 | India | In-depth interviews with doctors of different disciplines, religious teachers, Communication experts, and focused discussion groups with caregivers in Kerala. | Nair et al.55 | 252 | Anti-vaxxers use SMPs to influence caregivers' perceptions and beliefs. |
4 | Korea | Undergraduate college students in Seoul, unvaccinated for the HPV vaccine. | Kim60 | 323 | Multiple dimensions of perceived barriers showed differing impacts on vaccine acceptance. While the internet effectively reduced social barriers, SMPs harmed the intent to vaccinate. |
5 | China and the United States | Female participants above 18 years of age from China or the United States, unvaccinated for the HPV vaccine. | Pan et al.61 | 387 | The results show that exposure to contradictory information on social media had a more significant negative association with intentions to receive HPV vaccination among the United States participants than among the Chinese participants. |
SMP = social media platform, COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, HPV = human papillomavirus.