Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 19;118(4):804–811. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.08.007

TABLE 2.

Life’s Essential 8 and incidence of chronic kidney disease

Cases/person-y Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
HR (95% CI)
P
HR (95% CI)
P
HR (95% CI)
P
CKD
Cardiovascular health metrics
 Low 168/78,915.6 Ref Ref Ref
 Moderate 1542/1,175,936.4 0.54 (0.46, 0.63) <0.001 0.58 (0.49, 0.68) <0.001 0.61 (0.52, 0.72) <0.001
 High 226/322,509.6 0.35 (0.29, 0.43) <0.001 0.40 (0.33, 0.49) <0.001 0.43 (0.35, 0.53) <0.001
 Per SD increment in LE8 0.16 (0.12, 0.22) <0.001 0.21 (0.15, 0.27) <0.001 0.23 (0.18, 0.31) <0.001
Subscale
 Per SD increment in behavior scale 0.26 (0.21, 0.33) <0.001 0.31 (0.24, 0.39) <0.001 0.34 (0.27, 0.43) <0.001
 Per SD increment in biological scale 0.66 (0.54, 0.80) <0.001 0.68 (0.56, 0.83) <0.001 0.70 (0.57, 0.85) <0.001

CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HR, hazard ratio; LE8, Life’s Essential 8; Ref, reference; SD, standard deviation.

Model 1 was adjusted for age, ethnicity, and sex.

Model 2: Model 1 + Townsend deprivation index, education, and average household income.

Model 3: Model 2 + C-reactive protein and cancer at baseline.

Behavior scale and biological scale were mutually adjusted for subscale analyses.