Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;118(4):822–833. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.08.005

TABLE 3.

Results from multiple regression models examining variables potentially associated with systolic blood pressure

Variables Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Race 0.77 (0.19, 1.37) 0.041 0.56 (−0.03, 1.15) 0.159 0.44 (−0.16, 1.03) 0.147 0.12 (−0.54, 0.77) 0.722
Sex −0.24 (−0.53, 0.06) 0.298 −0.21 (−0.49, 0.07) 0.316 −0.15 (−0.43, 0.14) 0.299 −0.14 (−0.41, 0.14) 0.321
BMI (kg/m2) 0.32 (0.04, 0.60) 0.011 0.38 (0.09, 0.67) 0.011 0.39 (0.11, 0.67) 0.007
Urine Osm (mOsm/kgH2O) −0.06 (−0.35, 0.23) 0.684 −0.09 (−0.37, 0.20) 0.547
Cumulative ADI 0.31 (0.01, 0.62) 0.041
Adjusted R2(%) 5.2 16.3 14.7 20.9
P value 0.11 0.012 0.026 0.009

Unadjusted multiple linear regressions with race and sex (model 1) indicated race was associated with systolic blood pressure. The addition of BMI (model 2); urine flow rate; specific gravity; and osmolality (model 3); and cumulative ADI (model 4) revealed that race was not independently associated with systolic blood pressure. However; BMI and cumulative ADI were associated with systolic blood pressure. We are reporting standardized estimates and 95% confidence intervals and adjusted R2. Bolded text indicates a significant association.

For the final regression n = 53

Abbreviations: ADI, Area Deprivation Index; Osm, osmolality.