Table 3.
Relationship between hyperparathyroidism and PPI use (dichotomised by calcium supplement use, excluding those on thiazide and loop diuretics)
Calcium supplement use (Yes, n = 1179), (no, n = 1522) |
β coefficient | Odds ratio* | 95% confidence interval | p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
Model 1 | On calcium | 0.32 | 1.89 | 1.19 | 2.98 | 0.007 |
Not on calcium | 0.22 | 1.54 | 1.10 | 2.16 | 0.011 | |
Model 2 | On calcium | 0.29 | 1.80 | 1.13 | 2.86 | 0.013 |
Not on calcium | 0.12 | 1.28 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 0.161 | |
Model 3a | On calcium | 0.29 | 1.80 | 1.13 | 2.87 | 0.013 |
Not on calcium | 0.12 | 1.28 | 0.90 | 1.81 | 0.166 | |
Model 3b | On calcium | 0.30 | 1.82 | 1.14 | 2.90 | 0.012 |
Not on calcium | 0.13 | 1.28 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 0.159 |
*Reference group: PPI non-users
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, serum 25(OH)Da, eGFRa
Model 2: model 1 and BMI, timed up and goa, daily dairy intake
Model 3a: model 2 and bisphosphonates
Model 3b: model 2 and current glucocorticoid use
aKnotted spline function applied due to non-linearity between the logit of hyperparathyroidism and dependant variable
*PTH > 65 (n = 87 in calcium supplements users and n = 179 in non-calcium supplement users)