Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;34(11):1867–1880. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06829-0

Table 3.

Effect sizes of BTM outcomes

Time point Intervention Comparator Studies N Hedges’ g [95%CI] P value I2 Prediction interval1
Bone ALP End intervention EX + PT PT 3 379  − 0.6758 [− 5.8782; 4.5266] P = 0.6325 96.7% [− 30.9090; 29.5574]
PINP 3 months EX + PT PT 2 73  − 0.7434 [− 10.4164; 8.9297] P = 0.5076 89.1% NA
PINP End intervention EX + PT PT 2 73  − 0.3927 [− 10.9450; 10.1595] P = 0.7188 91.1% NA
CTX-I 3 months EX + PT PT 2 73  − 0.6890 [− 9.6091; 8.2310] P = 0.5059 87.4% NA
CTX-I End intervention EX + PT PT 2 73  − 0.0405 [− 7.0467; 6.9657] P = 0.9533 81.1% NA

EX exercise training, PT pharmacological therapy, 95%CI 95% confidence intervals, NA not available

1The prediction interval indicates the heterogeneity in the data and the range of potential values that could be possible in future studies