Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;10:63. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00587-y

Table 2.

The relative difference in SNR among distinct β values in Q.Clear reconstruction for hot lesions measuring 10 mm, 22 mm, and 37 mm in diameter, filled with LBRs of 2:1, 4:1, and 8:1 (Above)

LBR Lesion size Relative difference of SNR(%)
ΔSNR200-100 ΔSNR(300-200) ΔSNR400-300 ΔSNR500-400 ΔSNR500-100 ΔSNROSEM-500
2:1 10 mm 26.5 16 11.4 8.8 49.1 − 4.9
22 mm 24.9 12.8 6.9 3.9 42.8 − 0.9
37 mm 18.3 8.4 4.7 2.9 30.8 1.2
p S S S S S S
4:1 10 mm 26.1 14.8 9.5 7.3 45.1 − 10.2
22 mm 24.6 12.2 6.8 6.9 40.5 − 7.3
37 mm 21.7 10.6 6.4 4.7 37.4 − 3.1
p S S S NS S S
8:1 10 mm 25.2 13.6 8.7 6 43.7 − 30.6
22 mm 24.2 13.5 8.3 5.6 40.7 − 20.4
37 mm 22.1 12.5 8 5.4 44.0 − 18.8
p S S S NS S S
Relative difference of LE(%)
8:1 Lung insert ΔLE200-100 ΔLE300-200 ΔLE(400-300) ΔLE500-400 ΔLE500-100 ΔLEOSEM-500
 − 5.3  − 4.1  − 3.8  − 3.2  − 13.1 54.5
p S S NS NS S S

Additionally, the relative difference in lung residual error between OSEM and Q.Clear in the lung insert of the NEMA IEC phantom at the LBR of 8:1 is presented (Below). P values were deduced using a paired t test. ‘S’ denotes statistically significant differences (p value ≤ 0.05), whereas 'NS' indicates no significant variation (p value > 0.05).