Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;11:1250937. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1250937

TABLE 3.

Peak ground reaction force, joint kinetics, tibial strain, and tibial stress-fracture risk in women and men while running with no load, an 11.3-kg load, and a 22.7-kg load.

Load 0.0 kg 11.3 kg 22.7 kg
Women (N = 20) Men (N = 21) p-value ES Women (N = 20) Men (N = 21) p-value ES Women (N = 20) Men (N = 21) p-value ES
Ground reaction force (BW)
2.4 (0.1) 2.5 (0.2) 0.467 0.4 (−0.2,1.0) 2.6 (0.2) 2.6 (0.2) 0.325 0.4 (−0.2,1.0) 2.8 (0.2) 2.8 (0.3) 0.523 0.2 (−0.4,0.8)
Joint moments (N•m/kg)
Hip Flex 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) 0.615 0.0 (−0.6,0.7) 1.1 (0.2) 1.0 (0.1) 0.236 0.5 (−0.2,1.1) 1.2 (0.2) 1.1 (0.2) 0.203 0.4 (−0.2,1.0)
Hip Ext 1.8 (0.2) 2.2 (0.5) 0.007 1.2 (0.5,1.8) 2.1 (0.3) 2.5 (0.5) 0.004 1.0 (0.4,1.7) 2.4 (0.2) 2.7 (0.4) 0.010 1.0 (0.3,1.6)
Knee Ext 2.4 (0.5) 2.2 (0.4) 0.206 0.4 (−0.2,1.0) 2.4 (0.5) 2.3 (0.5) 0.388 0.2 (−0.4,0.8) 2.6 (0.5) 2.5 (0.5) 0.367 0.3 (−0.4,0.9)
Ankle PF 2.6 (0.3) 3.0 (0.5) 0.007 1.1 (0.4,1.7) 2.8 (0.2) 3.1 (0.5) 0.005 1.0 (0.4,1.7) 2.9 (0.3) 3.3 (0.5) 0.010 0.9 (0.3,1.5)
Joint reaction forces (BW)
Hip 9.4 (1.5) 8.0 (1.5) 0.007 1.0 (0.3,1.6) 10.4 (1.7) 8.6 (1.4) 0.004 1.2 (0.5,1.8) 11.6 (1.4) 9.3 (1.5) <0.001 1.5 (0.8,2.2)
Knee 12.6 (0.8) 11.5 (1.2) 0.007 1.0 (0.4,1.7) 13.8 (1.1) 12.5 (1.4) 0.005 1.0 (0.4,1.7) 15.1 (1.4) 13.1 (1.5) <0.001 1.4 (0.7,2.0)
Ankle 12.7 (0.9) 11.7 (1.9) 0.140 0.6 (0.0,1.3) 13.7 (1.4) 12.4 (1.8) 0.014 0.8 (0.2,1.4) 14.9 (1.6) 13.1 (2.0) 0.007 1.0 (0.3,1.6)
Tibial strain (με)
5,007 (867) 4,540 (906) 0.188 0.5 (−0.1,1.1) 5,439 (1,042) 4,835 (1,045) 0.061 0.6 (0.0,1.2) 5,908 (1,159) 5,036 (1,191) 0.031 0.7 (0.1,1.4)
Tibial stress-fracture risk (%)
4.5 (5.5) 3.3 (6.0) 0.140 0.2 (−0.4,0.8) 8.9 (10.3) 5.6 (12.0) 0.046 0.3 (−0.3,0.9) 15.7 (16.9) 7.7 (14.4) 0.031 0.5 (−0.1,1.1)

The data are presented as means (one standard deviation) or (95% confidence intervals). A bold p-value indicates a statistically significant difference between women and men, as determined by the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We applied the Benjamini–Hochberg correction in our analyses to account for multiple comparisons. BW, body weight; ES, effect size; Ext, extension; Flex, flexion; PF, plantarflexion.