Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 10;2014(1):CD003557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003557.pub5

Comparison 22. Silver dressing versus non‐antimicrobial dressing.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Complete healing at 4 to 12 weeks 4 424 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.95, 1.45]
2 Complete healing at 6 months 1 213 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.96, 1.28]
3 Complete healing at 12 months 1 213 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.94, 1.16]
4 Ulcer recurrence within first year 1 185 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.38, 1.70]
5 Change in ulcer surface area (cm squared) at 4 weeks 2 170 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐4.70 [‐8.46, ‐0.94]
6 Change in ulcer surface area (%) at 4 weeks 2   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Healing rate (cm squared per day) 2 170 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.12 [‐0.28, 0.03]
8 Proportion of participants reporting any type of adverse event 4 706 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.36, 1.33]