Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2023 Mar 15;615(7953):742–749. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05798-y

Extended Data Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

Propionate-bound
OR51E2-Gs
EMDB: Full map EMD-28896
EMDB: 7TM map EMD-28900
RCSB PDB: Model 8F76
Data collection
Microscope Thermo Scientific Krios G3i
Detector Gatan K3 with Gatan
BioQuantum Energy filter
Voltage (kV) 300
Magnification 105,000
Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −2.1
Pixel size, physical (Å) 0.81
Total exposure (e/Å2) 50
Frame exposure (e2/frame) 0.833
Images, number of 16,113
Frames/image, number of 60
Initial particles, number of 7,875,501
Final particles, number of 204,438
Symmetry imposed C1
Map sharpening, B factor (Å2)
 Full map −140.2
 7TM map −162.8
Map resolution, masked (Å)
 Full map 3.1
 7TM map 3.2
 FSC threshold 0.143
Refinement
Initial model used (AlphaFold code) Q9H255
Model resolution (Å) 3.2
 FSC threshold 0.5
Model composition
 Chains 6
 Non-hydrogen atoms 8,176
 Protein residues 1,038
 Ligands 1
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 37.96
 Ligand 38.56
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond length (Å) 0.005
 Bond angles (°) 0.873
Validation
 MolProbity score 1.51
 Clash score 5.64
 EMRinger score 3.50
 Rotamer outliers (%) 0
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 96.76
 Allowed (%) 3.24
 Disallowed (%) 0.00