Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 27;25(3):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.002

Table 2.

Manipulation of fluid output included studies.

Reference Study Design Country Sample Size AKI Definition Population RRT Intervention Comparator Assessment of Fluid Status Duration of Intervention Difference in FB Outcome Measures
Non-RRT patients
Bagshaw 2017 MC Pilot RCT Canada & Australia 73 (37/36) RIFLE AKI, RIFLE - RISK; ICU; CVL; IDC; SIRS = 2+; ‘Resuscitated' Non-RRT patients Furosemide bolus & infusion; titrated to UO Placebo Fluid balance 7 days; until RRT, death, or discharge 877 mL vs 2407 mL (- 1081 mL; 95% CI, −2697 to 467) Worsening AKI (43.2% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.6); Kidney recovery (29.7% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.3); RRT (27.0% s. 28.6%, p = 0.8)
Cagliani 2021 SC Retrospective USA 126 (39/87) RIFLE AKI, RIFLE - R, I or F; ICU; Surgical Non-RRT patients Furosemide & fenoldopam Furosemide alone Fluid balance 24 h R group: 1588 mL [774 mL–3765mL] vs 1074 mL [612 mL–3996mL]; p = 0.07. I or F group: 5179 mL [2121 mL–7233mL] vs 4230 mL [2132 mL–7843 mL]; p = 0.06. UO (421 mL vs 320 mL; p = 0.22); FB (4230 mL vs 5179 mL; p = 0.06); CrCl (48.5 vs 40.7; p = 0.53).
Zhao 2020 MC Retrospective USA 14154 (7885/6269) KDIGO ICU; AKI Non-RRT patients Furosemide No diuretic Fluid balance Variable Net FB (−575 mL vs −562 mL; p = 0.5); Positive FB (33.4% vs 33%; p = 0.752). Increase AKI stage (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.05–1.21; p < 0.01); RRT (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.29–1.76; p < 0.01); In-hospital mortality (12.7% vs 21.7%; p < 0.01).
RRT Patients
Nuchpramool 2019 SC RCT Thailand 36 (17/19) On CRRT. ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria BIVA-guided fluid management Standard care BIVA & fluid accumulation (unclear if FB or weight-based) Not provided Details not provided. “ … did not provide beneficial effects in the rate of fluid removal indicating by body weight and %FA." Mortality at day 28 (47% vs 52.6%; p = 0.78)
RashidFarokhi 2022 SC RCT Iran 65 (32/33) Not provided. On CRRT. ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria BIVA-guided, UFnet prescription Clinical parameters guided UFnet prescription Bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) ∼50 h. BIVA-defined hypervolaemia (31.3 vs 63.6%, p = 0.009) LBM (80.7 vs. 85.9; OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 0.2 to 10.1; p < 0.05); UO (0.9 mL/kg/hr; OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4–1.1; p = 0.04); Mortality at 30 days (53.15 vs 60.6%; OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3–2; p = 0.54)
Shin 2021 SC Retrospective South Korea 216 (88/42) Not provided ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria <20% downtime ≥ 20% downtime Fluid balance Not provided Not provided. Daily fluid balance lower on day 2 (p = 0.046) and day 3 (p = 0.031). Mortality (p = 0.95).
Mishra 2017 SC RCT India 60 (30/30) KDIGO ICU; CRRT; AKI; Septic shock RRT as inclusion criteria SLED CRRT Fluid balance Median 3.5 days Fluid balance per 24 h (0.79 L vs 0.68; p = 0.10) Haemodynamic stability, delta VD (39 vs 42; p = 0.39)
McCausland 2016 Post-hoc analysis of ATN MC RCT USA 871 (436/435) On CRRT. ICU; AKI; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Less intense dialysis (IHD or SLED 3x/week or CRRT at 20 mL/kg/hr) Intensive dialysis (IHD or SLED 6x/week or CRRT at 35 mL/kg/hr) Fluid balance 5-6 treatments Net balance (- 200 mL vs 4 mL; p < 0.01) UO (159 mL vs 106 mL; p < 0.01); UF volume (1850 mL vs 1700 mL; p = 0.22)
Gaudry 2018 Post-hoc analysis of AKIKI MC RCT France 348 (174/174) On CRRT. ICU; Septic shock; AKI; RRT as intervention Early RRT (post-randomisation) Late RRT (specific criteria to commence) Fluid balance Until CRRT cessation or ICU discharge FB first 48 h (2.2 L vs 2 L; p = 0.93); Fluid input first 48 h (4.1 L vs 4.1 L; p = 0.55); UO first 48 h (994 mL vs 1881 mL; P < 0.001); UF first 48 h (3.6 L vs 2.1 L; p < 0.01). RRT dependence at 60 days (3% vs 3%; p = 0.62)
Wald 2015 Pilot MC RCT Canada 101 (48/52) Not provided. On CRRT. ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Accelerated RRT (less than 12 h) Standard Care Fluid balance 14 days FB at day 14 (−1336 mL vs −57 mL) Mortality at day 90 (38% vs 37%; p = 0.92)
Xing 2019 SC Retrospective China 141 (57/84) RIFLE ICU; Septic AKI; CVP data RRT as inclusion criteria Early initiation (within 12 h of F criteria) Delay initiation (delay 48 h from F criteria) Fluid balance 5 days; death or discharge FB (1402 mL vs 1543 mL; p = 0.65) FB (as shown)
Wald 2022 Post-hoc analysis of START-AKI MC RCT Multinational 2716 (1366/1350) KDIGO ICU; AKI; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Accelerated strategy for CRRT initiation Standard strategy Fluid balance 14 days FB at 14 days (4509 mL vs 5646 mL; p = 0.03) Mortality at 90 days by FB quartiles 1–4 (1 = 40% vs 2 = 45.5% vs 3 = 45.2% vs 4 = 44.9%; p = 0.17)
Gaudry
2021
MC RCT France 278 (137/141) KDIGO ICU; AKI; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Delayed strategy More delayed strategy Fluid balance Until CRRT cessation of ICU discharge FB at 2 days (1584 mL vs 1581 mL; p 0.99); FB at 7 days (1744 mL vs 2072 mL; p = 0.79) RRT-free days at 60 days (12 vs 10; p = 0.93)
Murugan 2018 SC Retrospective USA 1075 (475/166/434) On CRRT. ICU; AKI; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Net ultrafiltration rate Different rates (mL/kg/day): 1) <20, 2) 20 - <25 3) >25 Fluid balance adjusted to body weight Median 4.7–8.7 days Cumulative FB at day 7 (10.1 vs 10.5 vs 10.1; p = 0.78); UF (19.5 L vs 27.9 L vs 26.6 L; p < 0.01); FB excluding UF (13.5 L vs 22 L vs 19 L; p < 0.01). Renal recovery at 1 year in survivors (82.6% vs 72.7% vs 78.4%; p = 0.25); Mortality at 1 year (69.7% vs 60.2% vs 59.4%; p = 0.003)
Murugan 2019 Post-hoc analysis of RENAL MC RCT Australia & New Zealand 1434 (477/479/478) On CRRT. ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Net ultrafiltration rate Different rates (mL/kg/hr): 1) <1.01, 2) 1.01–1.75 3) >1.75 Fluid balance Until CRRT cessation or ICU discharge Cumulative FB (2.3 L vs −0.4 L vs −3.6 L; p < 0.01). NUF (1.7 L vs 8.5 L vs 16.5 L; p < 0.01); FB excluding NUF (4.6 L vs 8.5 L vs16.5 L; p < 0.01) RRT dependence at day 90 (3.8% vs 5.8% vs 6.9%; p = 0.28); Mortality at day 90 (44.9% vs 39.2% vs 48.6%; p = 0.01)
Naorungroj 2020 SC Retrospective Thailand 347 (159/102/86) On CRRT ICU; CRRT RRT as inclusion Net ultrafiltration Different rates (mL/kg/hr): 1) <1.01, 2) 1.01–1.75 3) >1.75 Fluid balance Until CRRT cessation or ICU discharge Cumulative FB (527.0 mL vs −657 mL vs −1751 mL; p < 0.01); Unadjusted RRT dependence at day 28 (21.3% vs 17.9% vs 18.4%; p = 0.66); Unadjusted mortality at day 28 (25.8% vs 32.7% vs 18.4%; p = 0.066).
Wu 2021 MC Retrospective USA 911 (165/369/377) Not provided. On CRRT. ICU; Sepsis; CRRT RRT as inclusion criteria Net ultrafiltration rate Different rates (mL/kg/hr): 1) <1.6, 2) 1.6–3.1, 3) >3.1 Fluid overload expressed as percentage Until CRRT cessation or ICU discharge Cumulative fluid overload in 48 h (−0.6% vs −2.8% vs −4.8%; p < 0.01) In-hospital mortality (53.3% vs 40.4% vs 44.3%; p = 0.021); Renal recovery (55.2% vs 71.0% vs 69.5%; p < 0.01).
Non-RRT and RRT Patients
Berthelsen 2018 MC Pilot RCT Denmark 20 (7/13) Renal Recovery Score (RRS) RRS, Mod-High Risk (<60%); ICU <24 hrs; 10% fluid accumulation RRT commenced as per protocol Forced fluid removal to achieve CFB <1000 mL. Furosemide bolus & infusion then CRRT. Standard care Fluid balance 5 days; death or discharge - 8434 mL vs - 641 mL (5814 mL; 95% CI: 2063–9565, P = 0.003) CFB (as shown); Mean DFB (−1269 mL vs 133 mL; p < 0.01); Achieve neutral FB (86% vs 30%; p = 0.06)

Abbreviations: AKI = acute kidney injury; SC = single centre; MC = multicentre; RCT = randomised controlled trial; CRRT = continuous renal replacement therapy; RRT = renal replacement therapy; ICU = intensive care unit; FB = fluid balance; UO = urine output; CFB = cumulative fluid balance; CVL = central venous line; IDC = indwelling catheter; SIRS = systemic inflammatory response syndrome; CI = confidence interval; NUF = net ultrafiltration rate; STARRT-AKI = STandard versus Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury; ATN = Acute Renal Failure Trial Network; AKIKI = Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury; RENAL = Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level; BIVA = bioimpedance vector analysis.