Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 17;19(10):e1011465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011465

Fig 6. Causal powers analysis of various network architectures.

Fig 6

Each panel shows the network’s causal model and weights on the left. Blue regions indicate complexes with their respective φs values. In all networks, k = 4 and the state is Abcdef. The Φ-structure(s) specified by the network’s complexes are illustrated to the right (with only second- and third-degree relation faces depicted) with a list of their distinctions for smaller systems and their ∑φ values for those systems with many distinctions and relations. All integrated information values are in ibits. (A) A degenerate network in which unit A forms a bottleneck with redundant inputs from and outputs to the remaining units. The first-maximal complex is Ab, which excludes all other subsets with φs > 0 except for the individual units c, d, e, and f. (B) The modular network condenses into three complexes along its fault lines (which exclude all subsets and supersets), each with a maximal φs value, but low Φ, as the modules each specify only two or three distinctions and at most five relations. (C) A directed cycle of six units forms a six-unit complex with φs = 1.74 ibits, as no other subset is integrated. However, the Φ-structure of the directed cycle is composed of only first-order distinctions and few relations. (D) A specialized lattice also forms a complex (which excludes all subsets), but specifies 27 first- and high-order distinctions, with many relations (>1.5 × 106) among them. Its Φ value is 11452 ibits. (E) A slightly modified version of the specialized lattice in which the first-maximal complex is Abef. The full system is not maximally irreducible and is excluded as a complex, despite its positive φs value (indicated in gray).