Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 14;41(10):2751–2757. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04552-3

Table 2.

The score from different scoring systems

Scoring systems Total (N = 164) Survivors (N = 121) Non-survivors (N = 43) p Value
FGSI, median [IQR] 8 [5–12] 6 [4–8] 14 [12–15]  < 0.001
UFGSI, median [IQR] 8 [6–12] 7 [5–9] 13 [11–14]  < 0.001
SFGSI, median [IQR] 1 [0–3] 1 [0–2] 3 [0–4]  < 0.001
NFS, median [IQR] 1 [1–3] 1 [1–1] 2 [1–3]  < 0.001
LRINEC, median [IQR] 5 [3–7] 4 [3–6] 6 [4–9]  < 0.001
aCCI, median [IQR] 1 [1–2] 1 [0–1] 2 [1–2]  < 0.001
SOFA median [IQR] 2 [0–18] 1 [0–9] 9 [4–18]  < 0.001
qSOFA, median [IQR] 2 [1–2] 2 [1–2] 3 [2–3]  < 0.001
APACHE II, median [IQR] 3 [0–24] 2 [0–13] 15 [19–24]  < 0.001
SAS, median [IQR] 8 [7–8] 7 [7–8] 8 [8–9]  < 0.001

aCCI Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index; APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; FGSI Fournier gangrene severity index; LRINEC laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis; NFS NUMUNE Fournier score; qSOFA quick SOFA; SAS surgery APGAR score; SFGSI simplified FGSI; SOFA sequential organ failure assessment; UFGSI Uludag FGSI