Table 2.
Comparison of antibacterial properties of EO.
| EOs | Source | Major Compounds | Pathogen Strains | Dosage/MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) | Mechanism of anti-bacteria | Effects on biofilms/MBIC (minimal biofilms inhibitory concentration) | Mechanism of anti-biofilms | Safety | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | Clinopodium nepeta, Origanum vulgare and Foeniculum vulgare | piperitone oxide, estragole, and p-thymol, respectively | E. coli JM109, and its derived antibiotic-resistant cells | 0.3–0.966 μL/mL | methylation at both cytosine and adenine residues | – | – | – | [70] |
| Cedar EO | Cedar wood | e δ-cadinene (36.35%), (Z)-β-farnesene (13.8%), β-himachalene (9.4%), | M. luteus | MIC 90: 8.99 μL/mL | – | – | – | – | [71] |
| Cinnamon EO | – | cinnamaldehyde | Y. enterocolitica | 0.625 mg/mL | altering bacteria cell membrane structure, stability, and osmotic function | 0.078 mg/mL | interfering with the QS system by inhibiting AHL production | – | [72] |
| Clove essential oil (CEO) and Oregano essential oil (OEO) | – | eugenol and carvacrol, respectively | S. Derby | 0.8 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL, respectively | – | At 1/8 MIC, the inhibition rate of CEO and OEO on the biofilms formation was 90.29% and 48.79%. | suppressing the metabolic activity and the production of the extracellular polysaccharide | – | [73] |
| Composite EO | – | cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenol | E. coli and S. aureus | 7.94 μL/mL | destroying bacteria cell wall and cell membrane integrity, and retarding the respiratory chain | The biofilms of S. aureus decreased by 11.19%, 15.32%, and 18.09%, and that of E. coli decreased by 14.25%, 21.72%, and 22.37% after exposure (0 h) to EOs at 0.5 MIC, 1 MIC, and 2 MIC, respectively. | – | – | [74] |
| J. intigrimma, J. roseae and J. gossypifolia EO | leaves of Jatropha | diterpenes | E. coli | 5 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, and 2.5 mg/mL, respectively | – | 31.25 μg/mL, 250 and above 1000 μg/mL, respectively | disturbing adhesion proteins FimH | – | [75] |
| Propolis essential oil (PEO) | complex material that honey bees collect from resinous and balsamic material | β-himachalene (13.94%), α-curcumene (11.28%), α-bergamotene (4.5%) |
S. mutans | 0.625 μL/mL | – | 1/4 MIC or above can significantly reduce the biofilms biomasses compared to the control group (p < 0.05). | membrane permeability, releasing lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and calcium ions; inhibiting bacterial proliferation; suppressing the activity of glucosyltransferases (GTFs) to reduce the production of extracellular polysaccharides and alleviate bacterial adherence | IC10 value of PEO on HOECs was 1.299 μL/mL, which was significantly higher than double the MIC. | [76] |
| Thymus x citriodorus EO | Thyme species | monoterpenes (72.6%), being geraniol (27.5%), 1,8-cineole (16.3%), and thymol (9.2%); | C. acnes and S. epidermidis | 0.06% | – | 0.12%–0.24% | – | affecting cellular viability in a dose-dependent manner. | [77] |
| Thymus zygis subsp. gracilis EO | Lamiaceae | p-cymene (25.98 ± 0.07%), thymol (22.64 ± 0.06%), carvacrol (21.28 ± 0.06%), and γ-terpinene (11.01 ± 0.03%) | L. monocytogenes | 0.02% (v/v) | – | 0.02% (v/v) | – | – | [78] |