Table 5.
Comparison of strategy combination based on FT
| Methods | Mean | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| SWEWOA | 2.33 | 1 |
| WOA_S | 6.30 | 7 |
| WOA_W | 3.92 | 4 |
| WOA_E | 5.61 | 6 |
| WOA_SW | 3.63 | 3 |
| WOA_SE | 5.08 | 5 |
| WOA_WE | 2.46 | 2 |
| WOA | 6.67 | 8 |
Comparison of strategy combination based on FT
| Methods | Mean | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| SWEWOA | 2.33 | 1 |
| WOA_S | 6.30 | 7 |
| WOA_W | 3.92 | 4 |
| WOA_E | 5.61 | 6 |
| WOA_SW | 3.63 | 3 |
| WOA_SE | 5.08 | 5 |
| WOA_WE | 2.46 | 2 |
| WOA | 6.67 | 8 |