Table 2.
The associations between family PIR and HPV infection status.
Exposure | Model I OR (95% CI) P | Model II OR (95% CI) P | Model III OR (95% CI) P |
---|---|---|---|
Ratio of family income to poverty | 0.83 (0.81,0.86) <0.0001 | 0.91 (0.89, 0.94) <0.0001 | 0.91 (0.89, 0.94) <0.0001 |
PIR classification | |||
Low income(PIR<1) | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Middle income(PIR 1-4) | 0.70 (0.63, 0.77) <0.0001 | 0.83 (0.74, 0.92) 0.0005 | 0.82 (0.74, 0.92) 0.0004 |
High income(PIR≥4) | 0.46 (0.41, 0.52) <0.0001 | 0.70 (0.61, 0.79) <0.0001 | 0.69 (0.61, 0.79) <0.0001 |
P for trend | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Model I: None covariates were adjusted;
Model II: Age, race, and marital status were adjusted;
Model III: Age, race, marital status, drink status, smoke status, sexual intercourse, diabetes, and BMI were adjusted.
PIR, the ratio of family income to poverty; BMI, body mass index; HPV, human papillomavirus.