Skip to main content
. 1998 Sep;42(9):2326–2331. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2326

TABLE 3.

Comparison of results of flow cytometry and plaque reduction assays

Clinical isolate IC50 (μM)
Ganciclovir phenotypea
Flow cytometry assayb Plaque reduction assayc
V917401 >96 >96 R
MR11979 >96 >96 R
OBR >96 20 R
GU >96 13.2 R
MAL 8.48 7.93 PR
K8313 9.79 9.21 PR
V379354 3.27 5.52 S
SAG 6.66 5.65 S
MG 4.51 5.00 S
VIL 1.14 1.62 S
TUC 1.28 1.86 S
GRO 5.72 3.05 S
LAN 4.20 2.26 S
COP 6.65 3.62 S
MAC 6.30 4.02 S
BRO 6.53 4.20 S
PHI 3.91 1.32 S
LAP 4.82 2.33 S
HOW 1.39 2.18 S
PER 1.75 2.27 S
MCI 4.54 2.30 S
LA 2.48 1.17 S
JD 5.50 3.00 S
FK-1 6.28 1.75 S
FK-3 5.13 1.78 S
a

The phenotype was based on the results of the plaque reduction assay. R, resistant; PR, partially resistant; S, sensitive. 

b

Data are from a single analysis. 

c

Data are from a single plaque reduction assay performed in quadruplicate. The well-to-well variation in the numbers of PFU at the same drug concentration was less than 10%.