Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 30;12(9):2319–2335. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-84

Table 2. Correlation between RBMX expression and clinicopathologic parameters of patients with esophageal cancer.

Clinical features Level IOD high (n=27) IOD low (n=26) χ2 P
Gender (%) Male 17 (63.0) 18 (69.2) 0.232 0.63
Female 10 (37.0) 8 (30.8)
Age, years, median [IQR] 57 [37, 78] 60 [48, 75] 23.79 0.474
Distant metastatic site (%) No 24 (88.9) 25 (96.2) 1.002 0.317
Yes 3 (11.1) 1 (3.8)
Pathological grading (%) I 0 (0.0) 3 (11.5) 4.283 0.369
II 22 (81.5) 18 (69.2)
III 5 (18.5) 5 (19.2)
Pathological morphology (%) Not classified 3 (11.1) 2 (7.7) 2.963 0.813
Infiltrating ulcer type 2 (7.4) 1 (3.8)
Ulcerative type 13 (48.1) 14 (53.8)
Uplift type 6 (22.2) 7 (26.9)
Basin type 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0)
Constricted type 1 (3.7) 2 (7.7)
Mushroom type 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0)
Total lymph nodes, median [IQR] 12 [1, 30] 20 [3, 35] 22.902 0.69
Positive lymph node, median [IQR] 1 [0, 16] 0 [0, 7] 9.035 0.339
T (%) Not classified 1 (3.7) 6 (23.1) 6.072 0.194
T1 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0)
T2 6 (22.2) 4 (15.4)
T3 18 (66.7) 16 (61.5)
T4a 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0)
N (%) Not classified 0 (0.0) 2 (7.7) 4.43 0.351
N0 13 (48.1) 14 (53.8)
N1 6 (22.2) 7 (26.9)
N2 6 (22.2) 2 (7.7)
N3 2 (7.4) 1 (3.8)
M (%) M0 24 (88.9) 25 (96.2) 1.002 0.317
M1 3 (11.1) 1 (3.8)

RBMX, RNA binding motif protein X-linked; IOD, integrated optical density; IQR, interquartile range.