Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 5;24:101523. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101523

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted multinomial logistic regression results (relative risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals) showing the association between parental engagement at wave 1 and subsequent delayed marriage of girls at wave 2 in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, UDAYA (n = 5967).

Parental engagement Model I: Age at marriage (compared with early married girls) Model II: Age at marriage (compared with early married girls)a
Married 18-19 years Married 20-22 years Unmarried girls Married 18-19 years Married 20-22 years Unmarried girls
Discussed school performance 0.82* (0.67, 0.99) 0.60** (0.47, 0.76) 1.59** (1.38, 1.85) 0.62** (0.50, 0.77) 0.50** (0.38, 0.66) 1.33** (1.11, 1.60)
Discussed friendship 1.10 (0.90, 1.36) 1.72** (1.32, 2.25) 1.37** (1.17, 1.62) 1.03 (0.83, 1.28) 1.62** (1.22, 2.15) 1.37** (1.15, 1.64)
Discussed physical changes/menstruation 0.84 (0.68, 1.03) 0.61** (0.47, 0.79) 0.74** (0.62, 0.87) 0.88 (0.71, 1.09) 0.67** (0.51, 0.88) 0.80* (0.67, 0.95)
Discussed how pregnancy occurs 0.83 (0.43, 1.58) 1.66 (0.84, 3.26) 1.63* (1.02, 2.60) 0.76 (0.39, 1.47) 1.49 (0.74, 2.99) 1.50 (0.92, 2.46)
Parents know about free time spending 1.37* (1.04, 1.79) 1.58* (1.09, 2.29) 1.34** (1.10, 1.65) 1.18 (0.90, 1.56) 1.24 (0.84, 1.82) 1.08 (0.87, 1.34)
Can talk about personal things with parents 1.66** (1.34, 2.06) 1.89** (1.42, 2.51) 1.60** (1.36, 1.88) 1.39** (1.12, 1.73) 1.31 (0.98, 1.76) 1.29** (1.09, 1.54)

*p < 0.05.

**p < 0.01.

a

Model adjusted for residence, caste, religion, years of schooling, household wealth, state, and social/digital connectivity.