Table 2.
Subset of clusterings used to select the trait combination discussed in this study (in bold type). These were filtered from a full list of all possible trait combinations to comprise: at least three functional traits, cophenetic correlation coefficient >0.6, and average group R2 > 0.2. A combination involving all trait types (size, structural, chemical, anatomical) was assumed to be the most informative. Abbreviations of traits as in Table 1.
| No. of traits | Involved traits | Cophenetic correlation | No. of stable clusters | Average R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.76 | 2 | 0.34 |
| 3 | SLA, Height, Circularity | 0.76 | 4 | 0.34 |
| 6 | C:N, LCC, SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Bulliform cells | 0.61 | 2 | 0.33 |
| 5 | LCC, SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.65 | 2 | 0.32 |
| 3 | C:N, SLA, Leaf strength | 0.69 | 2 | 0.30 |
| 3 | SLA, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.61 | 4 | 0.30 |
| 5 | C:N, SLA, Leaf strength, Bulliform cells, Circularity | 0.61 | 2 | 0.29 |
| 4 | C:N, SLA, Height, Leaf strength | 0.66 | 2 | 0.28 |
| 6 | C:N, SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Bulliform cells, Circularity | 0.63 | 2 | 0.27 |
| 3 | LCC, SLA, Circularity | 0.63 | 2 | 0.25 |
| 3 | SLA, Height, Leaf strength | 0.61 | 2 | 0.25 |
| 5 | C:N, SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Bulliform cells | 0.64 | 2 | 0.24 |
| 5 | C:N, SLA, Height, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.7 | 2 | 0.24 |
| 4 | SLA, Height, Bulliform cells, Circularity | 0.69 | 3 | 0.24 |
| 3 | C:N, LCC, Leaf strength | 0.67 | 2 | 0.24 |
| 5 | C:N, LCC, SLA, Height, Leaf strength | 0.66 | 2 | 0.23 |
| 4 | C:N, Height, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.67 | 2 | 0.22 |
| 4 | C:N, SLA, Leaf strength, Circularity | 0.63 | 2 | 0.21 |
| 4 | C:N, Leaf strength, Bulliform cells, Circularity | 0.62 | 2 | 0.20 |