Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 17;18:328. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02907-y

Table 2.

Reasons why people stop going to a SAC to receive care for their ataxia

Reasons UK N (%) Germany Italy
Problems with travelling / transport to SAC 12 (25.5%) 5 (16.7%) 12 (26.6%)
Did not find it useful 6 (12.8%) 1 (3.3%) 8 (17.8%)
Not referred again 7 (14.9%) 1 (3.3%) -
Equal care locally 2 (4.3%) 4 (13.3%) 8 (17.8%)
Unable to take the time off work to visit the centre 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Other [please specify in the text box] 5 (10.6%) 10 (33.4%) 9 (20%)
Unsure 2 (4.3%) 9 (30%) 8 (17.8%)
Do not wish to answer 1 (2.1%)
Closure of a centre 12 (25.5%)
Total N respondents 47 (100%) 30 (100%) 45 (100%)

Below are the comments of participants for each country who answer ‘other’: Other reasons in the UK: ataxia is mild, waiting for referral, waiting for an appointment, feel others would benefit more than me i.e. younger people

Other reasons in Germany: cancellation due to Covid, diagnosis not verified so only taking part in research, only required to see them every two years, was asked to see a general neurologist, ongoing care, attended an appointment at SAC as part of a research study

Other reasons in Italy: I am disappointed with the answers from the specialists, Latina is far from Rome, C/O Besta Institute/Milan they told me that at Ferrara hospital they can take care of me, At Besta they couldn't do nothing more, far from the centre - transport problems, I attend a non-ataxia specialist daily association but I am well followed up and they well understand my condition, I am still occasionally followed up, During the first years they seem to help then nothing, I hope they could do more they simply gave me a diagnosis suggesting me to refer to a neurologist I trust, I lost my contacts and not yet found an ataxia specialist who can follow me up in Puglia or near, stopped due to Covid