Table 3.

Results of Post-Curriculum Survey

POST-CURRICULUM SURVEY
	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
The presentations were well organized	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (7.1)	6 (42.9)	7 (50)
The information presented was relevant to my practice	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (14.2)	9 (64.3)	3 (21.3)
Overall expectations were met	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (14.2)	4 (28.6)	8 (57.1)
The information presented is useful for training as a Hematologist/Oncologist	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (14.2)	4 (28.6)	8 (57.1)
The discussions improved my insight into disparities in Hematology/Oncology	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (14.2)	4 (28.6)	8 (57.1)
	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Overall clinical training in disparities in healthcare	0 (0)	0 (0)	3 (21.4)	9 (64.3)	2 (15)
Understanding of racial/ethical disparities in Hematology/Oncology	0 (0)	1 (7.15)	4 (28.6)	6 (42.9)	3 (21.4)
Understanding of gender-identity and sexual orientation in Hematology/Oncology	0 (0)	2 (14.3)	4(28.6)	5 (35.7)	3 (21.4)
Understanding of language barriers in Hematology/Oncology	0 (0)	1 (7.1)	4(28.6)	4(28.6)	5 (35.7)
Disparities in clinical trials and access to novel therapies	0 (0)	1 (7.1)	4(28.6)	6 (42.9)	3 (21.4)
	Journal articles	Panel discussions	Modules	Podcasts
What was your favorite session or part of the curriculum?	1 (6.67%)	12 (80%)	1 (6.67%)	1 (6.67%)
	Yes	No
Do you feel you need more training in healthcare disparities?	10 (71%)	4 (29%)
	Yes	No
After this focus on health disparities, do you plan to incorporate health disparities into a future research or clinical project?	11 (79%)	1 (7%)
	Yes	No
Would you recommend this curriculum to future hematology/oncology fellows?	10 (71%)	0 (0%)
	Yes	No
Do you recommend that the fellowship program have a formal health disparities curriculum?	11 (79%)	3 (21%)