Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;383:e076387. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076387

Table 1.

Recommended checklist items to consider in an early phase dose-finding clinical trial report from CONSORT 2010 and CONSORT-DEFINE checklists

Category and section Standard CONSORT checklist item CONSORT-DEFINE checklist item for EPDF Trials
Item No CONSORT Item No CONSORT DEFINE
Title and abstract
Title 1a Identification as a randomised trial in the title 1a† Identification as an early phase dose-finding (eg, first-in-human, dose escalation or de-escalation, phase 1, phase 1/2, expansion, dose titration) and, if applicable, randomised trial in the title or abstract
Abstract 1b Structured summary of trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (for specific guidance, see CONSORT for abstracts) 1b Structured summary of trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (for specific guidance, see CONSORT-DEFINE for abstracts)
Introduction
Background and objectives 2a

Scientific background and explanation of rationale

2a.1† Description of research question(s) and justification for undertaking the trial, including summary of relevant clinical studies (published and unpublished) examining benefits and harms for each intervention
2a.2* Summary of key findings from relevant non-clinical or preclinical research
2a.3* Summary of findings from previously generated preclinical and translational studies to support any planned biomarker substudies (where applicable)
2b Specific objectives or hypotheses 2b† Specific objectives (eg, relating to safety, activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, recommended dose(s))
Methods
Trial design 3a









Description of trial design (such as parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio









3a.1† Description of trial design elements, such as dose escalation or de-escalation strategy, number of treatment groups, allocation ratio if relevant, and details of any prespecified trial adaptations
3a.2* Trial design schema to show the flow of major transition points (eg, dose escalation to dose expansion, phase 1 to phase 2, single ascending dose to multiple ascending dose)
3a.3* Statistical methods or rationale underpinning the trial design
3a.4* Starting dose(s) with rationale
3a.5* Range of planned dose levels with rationale
3a.6* Presentation of planned dose levels (eg, as a diagram, table, or infographic), where applicable
3a.7* Skipping of dose level(s), if applicable
3a.8* Planned cohort size(s) (eg, fixed, flexible, adaptive)
3a.9* Dose allocation method within a dose level (including sequence and interval between dosing of participants, eg, sentinel or staggered dosing)
3a.10* Dose expansion cohort(s), if applicable, with rationale
3a.11* Criteria for progression to the next part of the trial (eg, phase 1 to phase 2, single ascending dose to multiple ascending dose), where applicable
3b Important changes to methods after trial commencement (such as eligibility criteria), with reasons 3b† Important changes to the design or methods after trial commencement (eg, insertion of unplanned additional doses) outside the scope of the prespecified adaptive design features, with reasons
Participants 4a Eligibility criteria for participants 4a
4b Settings and locations where the data were collected 4b
Interventions 5
The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered
5a† Interventions for each dose level (within each group) with sufficient details to allow replication, including administration route and schedule showing how and when they were actually administered
5b* Criteria for dose discontinuation, dose modifications, and dosing delays of allocated interventions for a given trial participant (eg, dose change in response to harms, participant request, or improving or worsening disease)
Outcomes 6a Completely defined prespecified primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed 6a† Primary and secondary outcomes, including the specific measurement variable, analysis metric, method of aggregation, and time point for each outcome. Explanation of the clinical relevance of chosen outcomes is strongly recommended. Any other outcomes used to inform prespecified adaptations should be described with the rationale
6b Any changes to trial outcomes after the trial commenced, with reasons 6b† Any unplanned changes to trial outcomes after the trial commenced, with reasons
Sample size 7a How sample size was determined 7a† Estimated number of participants (minimum, maximum, or expected range) needed to address trial objectives and how it was determined, including clinical and statistical assumptions supporting any sample size and operating characteristics
7b When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines 7b† Prespecified interim decision making criteria or rules that guided the trial adaptation process (eg, dosing decision to escalate or de-escalate); prespecified and actual timing and frequency of interim data reviews and the information to inform trial adaptations
Randomisation (if applicable)
Sequence generation 8a Method used to generate the random allocation sequence 8a
8b Type of randomisation; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size) 8b† Type of randomisation; details of any restrictions (such as blocking and block size); any prespecified adaptive assignment rules or algorithm leading to adjustments in the allocation ratio, including timing and frequency of updates; any changes to the allocation rule following trial adaptation decisions
Allocation concealment mechanism 9 Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (such as sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned 9
Implementation 10 Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions 10
Blinding 11a If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (eg, participants, care providers, and how 11a
11b If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions 11b
Statistical methods 12a
Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary and secondary outcomes
12a.1† Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes and any other outcomes used to make prespecified adaptations
12a.2* For the implemented adaptive design features, statistical methods used for estimation (eg, safety, dose(s), treatment effects) and to make inferences
12b Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses 12b† Statistical methods for additional analyses (eg, subgroup and adjusted analyses, pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, biomarker correlative analyses)
12c* Analysis population(s) (eg, evaluable population for dose-finding, safety population)
12d* Strategies for handling intercurrent events occurring after treatment initiation (eg, how dosing adjustments were handled) that can affect either the interpretation or the existence of the measurements associated with the clinical question of interest, and any methods to handle missing data
Results
Participant flow (a diagram is strongly recommended) 13a For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome 13a† For each group, the number of participants who were assigned to each dose level at each interim analysis (eg, for dosing decisions), received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome and, if applicable, any other outcomes used to inform prespecified adaptations
13b For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons 13b† For each group, losses and exclusions after allocation to each dose level, together with reasons
Recruitment 14a§ Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up 14a§
14b§ Why the trial ended or was stopped 14b§
14c* Trial adaptation decisions made (including on what basis they were made, and when) in light of the prespecified decision making criteria and observed accrued data
Baseline data 15 A table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group 15† Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across each dose level within each group, where appropriate
Numbers analysed 16 For each group, number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups 16† For each group, the number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis across each dose level, and whether the analysis was by original assigned interventions
Outcomes and estimation 17a For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision (such as 95% confidence interval) 17a† For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each dose level within each group, and the estimated effect size and its precision, if applicable
17b§ For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended 17b§
17c* Report interim results used to inform interim decision making such as dose escalation, de-escalation, or staying at the same dose
Ancillary analyses 18 Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing prespecified from exploratory 18
Harms 19 All important harms or unintended effects in each group (for specific guidance, see CONSORT for harms14) 19† All important harms (eg, adverse events or effects, toxicities) reported by dose level in each group (for specific guidance, see CONSORT for harms52)
Discussion
Limitations 20 Trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, imprecision, and, if relevant, multiplicity of analyses 20
Generalisability 21 Generalisability (external validity, applicability) of the trial findings 21
Interpretation 22 Interpretation consistent with results, balancing benefits and harms, and considering other relevant evidence 22
Other information
Registration 23 Registration number and name of trial registry 23
Protocol 24 Where the full trial protocol can be accessed, if available 24
Funding 25 Sources of funding and other support (such as supply of drugs), role of funders 25
Data monitoring 26a* Composition of any decision making or safety review committee or group; summary of its role and reporting structure; statement of whether it is independent from the sponsor and competing interests; and reference to where further details can be found (such as in a charter or protocol)
26b* Description of who had access to interim results and made the interim and final decision to terminate the trial (or part(s) of the trial, eg, end of dose escalation), and measures to safeguard the confidentiality of interim information
Dissemination 27* Specify, if applicable, whether and when results (such as safety and/or activity) were reported externally (eg, through scientific presentations, journal publication, or the trial website) while the trial (or part(s) of the trial) was still ongoing

CONSORT=CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials; DEFINE=Dose-finding Extension; EPDF=early phase dose-finding. This checklist should be used in conjunction with the CONSORT explanation and elaboration document37 for important clarifications on the checklist items. Empty items in the CONSORT-DEFINE column indicate no modification from the standard CONSORT item. CONSORT extensions for non-pharmacological treatments and outcomes might also be relevant.53 Note that the term “dose” in the checklist can be considered synonymous and used interchangeably with dosage, or dosing regimen (dose or schedule), or a unit dose.

*

New items that should only be applied in reference to CONSORT-DEFINE.

Modified items that require reference to both CONSORT and CONSORT-DEFINE.

§

Item wording remains unchanged in reference to CONSORT, but additional CONSORT-DEFINE explanatory text has been provided to clarify additional considerations for early phase dose-finding trials (web appendix 3).