Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;13:1265304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265304

Table 2.

Threshold effect analysis of age on OS, BCSS, and DFS among 1054 breast patients.

Variable Model 1 P-value Model 2 P-value Model 3 P-value
HR (95% CI) * HR (95% CI) * HR (95% CI) *
OS
Age, years☆ 1.02(1.00-1.04) 0.055 1.02(1.00-1.04) 0.031 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.021
Inflection point★
Age<44 years 0.93 (0.87, 1.00) 0.039 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 0.073 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 0.074
Age>44 years 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) 0.002 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) 0.002 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.001
P for log likelihood ratio test 0.015 0.025 0.017
BCSS
Age, years☆ 1.02(1.00-1.05) 0.103 1.02(1.00-1.05) 0.057 1.02(1.00-1.05) 0.063
Inflection point★
Age<44 years 0.90 (0.84, 0.97) 0.007 0.93 (0.85, 1.01) 0.100 0.93 (0.85, 1.02) 0.119
Age>44 years 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.001 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.002 1.05 (1.02, 1.09) 0.002
P for log likelihood ratio test 0.004 0.037 0.038
DFS
Age, years☆ 1.01(0.99-1.02) 0.275 1.01(0.99-1.02) 0.180 1.01(0.99-1.03) 0.171
Inflection point★
Age<41 years 0.92 (0.86, 0.97) 0.004 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) 0.008 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) 0.006
Age>41 years 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 0.010 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.013 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 0.007
P for log likelihood ratio test 0.004 0.007 0.004

Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for tumor size, molecular subtype. Model 3: adjusted for tumor size, molecular subtype, lymph nodes in the axilla status, operation type, adjuvant therapy, hormonal therapy. *Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs. ☆Fitting model by standard Cox proportional hazards model. ★Fitting model by two-piecewise Cox proportional hazards model.

The bold values denote statistical significance at P<0.05 level.