Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;10:1089087. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1089087

Table 1.

Comparison of patients in automated versus manual reviews and measures of agreement for individual responses for continuous variables.

Variable name Automation
(Mean, SD)
Manual
(Mean, SD)
Mean difference (SE) Pearson interclass correlation coefficient (PCC), 95% CI Strength of agreement based on PCC
Age, N = 652 57.9 (21.9) 58.5 (19.9) −0.5 (0.3) 0.95 (0.94–0.96) Extremely High
Height, N = 632 167.6 (15.6) 167 (17.2) 0.6 (0.3) 0.89 (0.87–0.90) High
Weight, N = 632 87.2 (27) 88.4 (28.5) −1.2 (0.4) 0.94 (0.93–0.95) Extremely High
Hospital LOS, N = 540 9.0 (9.1) 9.0 (9) 0.1 (0.1) 0.97 (0.96–0.97) Extremely High
Days to ICU admission, N = 176 1.3 (3.3) 1.1 (2.6) 0.2 (0.1) 0.80 (0.74–0.85) High
ICU LOS, N = 168 7.5 (9.3) 9.0 (10.5) −1.5 (0.4) 0.88 (0.85–0.91) High
IMV Days, N = 71 9.7 (9.6) 11.6 (11.1) −1.9 (0.6) 0.88 (0.81–0.92) High

CI, Confidence interval; ICU, Intensive Care Unit; IMV, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation; LOS, Length of stay; PCC, Pearson Interclass Correlation Coefficient; SD, Standard deviation; SE, Standard error.