Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;67(10):e00636-23. doi: 10.1128/aac.00636-23

TABLE 2.

Summary of effectiveness of compounds against HuNoV in HIEs a

Figure Genotype P-type HIE line Compound EC90 (μM) EC50 (μM) CC50 (μM) SI Antiviral activity
2 GII.4 Sydney GII.P31 J2 2′CMC 54.0 10.0 >316 >31.6 At least moderate
3 GII.4 Sydney GII.P31 J2 NTZ 43.0 37.1 69.7 1.9 Inactive
4 GII.3 GII.P21 J4FUT2 NTZ >80 14.4 64.7 4.5 Weak
5 GII.17 GII.P13 J4FUT2 NTZ >80 33.4 63.6 1.9 Inactive
6 GI.1 GI.P1 J4FUT2 NTZ 76.3 27.4 73.3 2.7 Weak
7 GII.4 Sydney GII.P16 J2 NTZ >80 12.9 51.2 4.0 Weak
7 GII.4 Sydney GII.P16 D2004 NTZ >80 42.8 50.9 1.2 Inactive
7 GII.4 Sydney GII.P16 J2004 NTZ >80 53.9 63.1 1.2 Inactive
7 GII.4 Sydney GII.P16 IL2004 NTZ 46.0 40.0 57.0 1.4 Inactive
a

EC50 and EC90 were calculated on the percent inhibition data, and CC50 was calculated on the percent viability data presented in Fig. 2 to 7 using non-linear regression. Selective index (SI) was calculated using EC50 and CC50. Antiviral activity of each compound is denoted based on the SI: inactive = SI < 2; weak = 2 ≤ SI < 10; moderate = 10 ≤ SI < 50; high = SI ≥ 50.