Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 20;67(10):e00419-23. doi: 10.1128/aac.00419-23

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Fluo-4 induced Ca2+ signals in Brugia muscles. (A) Micrograph of a fluorescing dissected Brugia muscle injected with 5 µM Fluo-4 under blue light. Key structures of the body, nucleus, and muscle arms are indicated with the arrows. The red box indicates the region of interest (ROI) where we take the calcium recording. ROI is determined as the clearest part of the muscle cell with good Fluo-4 fluorescence. (B) Representative control trace of Fluo-4 fluorescence in a muscle being washed with bath solution containing 1 mM CaCl2 followed by an increase to 10 mM CaCl2 for 1 minute (gray box). (C) Total amplitudes of Fluo-4 fluorescence in response to constant 1 mM CaCl2 bath solution perfusion (black bar) and to 10 mM CaCl2 (gray bar). *** indicates significantly different to 1 mM CaCl2 bath solution (bath solution vs CaCl2). P < 0.001, t = 8.817, df = 5, paired t-test. n = 6, individual muscles from six individual Brugia females. All values are represented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).