Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 5;109(10):2991–2995. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000579

Table 2.

(a) Diagnostic accuracy of EUS T and RMN T. (b) Diagnostic accuracy of EUS N and RMN N.

Accuracy of EUS T Accuracy of RMN T
N° of patients 123 129
True positive 67 88
False positive 11 21
False negative 29 10
True negative 16 10
Sensitivity 69.79% (59.57–78.75%) 89.80% (82.03–95.00%)
Specificity 59.26% (38.80–77.61%) 32.26% (16.68–51.37%)
Positive Predictive Value 85.90% (79.14–90.72%) 80.73% (76.51–84.35%)
Negative Predictive Value 35.56% (26.29–46.05%) 50.00% (31.48–68.52%)
Diagnostic Accuracy 67.48% (58.45–75.65%) 75.97% (67.66–83.05%)
Accuracy of EUS N Accuracy of RMN N
N° of patients 123 129
True positive 7 24
False positive 12 57
False negative 18 5
True negative 86 43
Sensitivity 28.00% (12.07–49.39%) 82.76% (64.23–94.15%)
Specificity 87.76% (79.55–93.51%) 43.00% (33.14–53.29%)
Positive Predictive Value 36.84% (20.40–57.03%) 29.63% (24.92–34.82%)
Negative Predictive Value 82.69% (78.73–86.05%) 89.58% (78.97–95.17%)
Diagnostic Accuracy 75.61% (67.05–82.90%) 51.94% (42.97–60.81%)