Skip to main content
. 2023 May 11;44(6):1430–1436. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001382

TABLE 3.

Comparison of auditory and neuro-electrophysiological results between patients with typewriter tinnitus and controls with idiopathic unilateral tinnitus

Valuables Sensorineural Tinnitus (n = 38) Typewriter Tinnitus (n = 18) p
Age (mean ± SD, y) 45.2 ± 13.8 49.4 ± 13.6 0.282
Gender (n, %)
 Male 19 (50.0) 7 (38.9) 0.436
 Female 19 (50.0) 11 (61.1)
Duration of tinnitus 1.0 (0.4–5.0) 0.7 (0.3–1.1) 0.122
Lateral (n, %)
 Left 23 (60.5) 8 (44.4) 0.258
 Right 15 (39.5) 10 (55.6)
PTA (median[IQR], dB HL) 17.5 (11.3–28.8) 16.3 (10.9–27.8) 0.752
ABR
 I wave latency (median[IQR], ms) 1.7 (1.6–1.7) 1.7 (1.6–1.7) 0.209
 III wave latency (median[IQR], ms) 3.8 (3.7–3.9) 4.1 (4.0–4.3) <0.001 *
 V wave latency (median[IQR], ms) 5.7 (5.6–5.8) 5.9 (5.8–6.1) 0.003 *
 IPL I-III (median[IQR], ms) 2.2 (2.1–2.3) 2.4 (2.3–2.5) <0.001 *
 IPL III-V (mean ± SD, ms) 1.9 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1 0.055
 IPL I-III ≥2.3 ms (n, %)
  No 35 (92.1) 0 (0.0) <0.001 *
  Yes 2 (5.3) 18 (100.0)
  Absent response 1 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
*

P<0.05.

ABR, auditory brainstem response; IPL, interpeak latency; IQR, interquartile range; PTA, pure-tone audiometry; SD, standard deviation.