Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0289339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289339

Table 8. Summary of defects in shmoo formation among HSP70 and HSP90 network mutants.

Strain1 aF mM %Shmoo # shmoo2 #total-shmoo2 p-value3
WT EY3136 5 54 (100)4 169 146
ssa1D ssa2D EY3141 5 15 (28) 60 342 <0.00001
1D2D4D GAL1p-SSA1 5
t = 0 hr repress SSA1 34.6 (100) 121 229
t = 6 hr repress SSA1 3.1 (9) 11 339 <0.00001
WT EYL1740 2.5 36 (100)2.5 174 309
WT EYL1740 5 54 (100)5 512 432
snl1D 2.5 24 (67) 238 542 0.0481
fes1D 2.5 27 (75) 273 726 0.1539
fes1D 2.5 34 (94) 386 761 0.3613
fes1D 2.5 31 (86) 659 1487 0.0264
fes1D total tally 2.5 28.7 (80) 1318 2974 0.0197
sti1D 5 82 (152) 378 84 <0.00001
ydj1D 2.5 24 (67) 133 416 0
ydj1D 5 23 (45) 110 172 <0.00001
ssb1D 5 46 (85) 241 245 0.1049
ssb1D 5 5 53 (98) 336 633 <0.00001
sse1D 5 42 (78) 262 368 <0.00001
sse2D 5 0 (0) 0 202 <0.00001
ssz1D 5 8 (15) 54 614 <0.00001

1Strains and data are taken from Table 5, S1, S7 and S8.

2#Shmoo is the number of cells that had a shmoo morphology. #Total-shmoo is the total number of cells scored minus the number of shmoo cells.

3p-values were calculated using the Fisher’s Exact Test at the Social Science Statistics website socistatistics.com, copyright 2023 Jeremy Stangroom.

4The numbers in parentheses (#) are % wild type shmoo formation.

5The sample was counted a second time with more cells in the tally.