Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 18;408(1):410. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03142-6

Table 2.

Risk of bias (using the RoB2 tool [13])

Study Randomisation process Deviations from the intended interventions Missing outcome data Measurement of the outcome Selection of the reported result Overall rating
Pedegana et al. 1977 [15] - !  +  - ! -
Van Arsdalen et al. 1983 [16]  +  -  +  - ! -
Bucci et al. 1989 [17]  +   +   +  - ! -
Ryan 2002 [19]  +   +   +   +   +   + 
Silbersack et al. 2004 [20]  +  !  +   +   +  !
Chin et al. 2009 [21] ! !  +   +  ! !
Turpie et al. 1989 [28]  +   +   +  -  +  -
Goldhaber et al. 1995 [27] ! !  +  !  +  !
Gao et al. 2012 [23]  +  -  +  - - -
Prell et al. 2018 [25] !  +  -  +   +  !
Sang et al. 2018 [26] ! !  +  !  +  !
Lobastov et al. 2021 [24] - - !  +   +  -

‘+’ Low risk; ‘!’ Some concerns; ‘-’ High risk