Table 4.
Pooled analysis of the secondary outcome—feeling in the morning after study night (“How do you feel now?”)
| Study | N: 0–60 | N: 60–0 | Median difference (95% CI) | p Value | Test statistic | Carry-over effect p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pooled analysis | 133 | 141 | 2 (2; 2.5) | < 0.0001 | 2423 | 0.10 |
| Pooled analysis without Herzog et al. (2019) [9] | 99 | 105 | 2 (1.5; 2.5) | < 0.0001 | 1551 | 0.20 |
| Schmidt et al. (2013) [15] | 36 | 38 | 2 (1; 2.5) | < 0.0001 | 225 | 0.23 |
| Schmidt et al. (2015) [14] | 28 | 32 | 1.5 (1; 2.5) | < 0.0001 | 142 | 0.88 |
| Herzog et al. (2019) [9] | 34 | 36 | 2.5 (2; 3.5) | < 0.0001 | 103.5 | 0.24 |
| Schmidt et al. (2021) [16] | 35 | 35 | 2 (1.5; 3) | < 0.0001 | 148 | 0.29 |
Statistically significant p values < 0.05 are in bold
Results were derived from two sample Wilcoxon rank sum tests comparing the two different noise sequences (0–60 vs. 60–0 simulated noise events). CI Confidence interval