Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 11;112(11):1690–1698. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02297-y

Table 4.

Pooled analysis of the secondary outcome—feeling in the morning after study night (“How do you feel now?”)

Study N: 0–60 N: 60–0 Median difference (95% CI) p Value Test statistic Carry-over effect p value
Pooled analysis 133 141 2 (2; 2.5)  < 0.0001 2423 0.10
Pooled analysis without Herzog et al. (2019) [9] 99 105 2 (1.5; 2.5)  < 0.0001 1551 0.20
Schmidt et al. (2013) [15] 36 38 2 (1; 2.5)  < 0.0001 225 0.23
Schmidt et al. (2015) [14] 28 32 1.5 (1; 2.5)  < 0.0001 142 0.88
Herzog et al. (2019) [9] 34 36 2.5 (2; 3.5)  < 0.0001 103.5 0.24
Schmidt et al. (2021) [16] 35 35 2 (1.5; 3)  < 0.0001 148 0.29

Statistically significant p values < 0.05 are in bold

Results were derived from two sample Wilcoxon rank sum tests comparing the two different noise sequences (0–60 vs. 60–0 simulated noise events). CI Confidence interval