Table 2.
The number of articles according to the types of methods for removing microplastics from the aqueous environment in the present study
No. | Removal Method | Removal process | Major microplastic | Year of publication | Country | Number of articles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Physical | Adsorption, filtration, flotation with dissolved air | Polystyrene, polyethylene, polyamide | 2020–2022 | India, China, Spain, Indonesia, Switzerland, Finland, Taiwan | 12 |
2 | Chemical | Coagulation, electrocatalysis, electrooxidation, nanocarbon, UV | Polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride | 2018–2022 | China, Australia, South Korea, Switzerland, Sweden, America, Canada | 18 |
3 | Physico-chemical | Coagulation and filtration, adsorption and thermal degradation, photocatalyst, magnetic carbon nanotubes | Polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyamide | 2019–2021 | China, Sweden, America, Canada, Malaysia, India, Mexico, Germany, Spain, Iran | 27 |
4 | Biological | Using fungi, bacterial consortium, microalgae, biofilter, biofilm | Polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyamide, polyethylene tetraphthalate | 2017–2021 | China, South Korea, Canada, Iceland, Denmark, Italy, Saudi Arabia | 12 |
5 | Integrated | biological membrane (MBR), Rapid sand filter (RSF), oxidation channel system and rapid sand filter (RSF), oxidation channel (OD) and membrane bioreactor (MBR), A2/O, secondary sedimentation, denitrification, UF, O3, UV | Polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyamide, polyethylene tetraphthalate | 2017–2021 | China, South Korea, Finland, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Turkey | 11 |