Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 14;36(6):2554–2566. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00888-9

Table 3.

Differences in MRI performance between the DPHCC, NCPHCC and ICC groups

Variables DPHCC(a) (n = 27) NDPHCC(b) (n = 113) ICC (c)
(n = 68)
P value
(a vs b)
P value
(a vs c)
Tumor 0.570 0.071
  Single 19(70.4%) 73(64.6%) 34(50.0%)
  multiple 8(29.6%) 40(35.4%) 34(50.0%)
The larger tumor length (cm) 4.62 ± 3.02 4.76 ± 3.49 6.69 ± 3.54 0.914 0.006
Tumor margin 0.000 0.000
  smooth 8(29.6%) 92(81.4%) 1(1.5%)
  non-smooth 19(70.4%) 21(18.6%) 67(98.5%)
Tumor capsule 0.000 0.073
present 8(29.6%) 82(72.6%) 8(11.8%)
absent 19(70.4%) 31(27.4%) 60(88.2%)
Hemorrhage 0.243 1.000
  present 1(3.7%) 16(14.2%) 3(4.4%)
  absent 26(96.3%) 97(85.8%) 65(95.6%)
Necrosis or cystic degeneration 0.787 0.311
  present 12(44.4%) 47(41.6%) 21(30.9%)
  absent 15(55.6%) 66(58.4%) 47(69.1%)
Intratumor fat 0.000 0.166
  present 2 (7.4%) 63(55.8%) 15(22.1%)
  absent 25(92.6%) 50(44.2%) 53(77.9%)
Contrast enhancement pattern 0.000 0.001
  Fast in and fast out 8(29.6%) 107(94.7%) 2(2.9%)
  Persistent 19(70.4%) 6(5.3%) 66(97.1%)
Intratumor progressive small nodular enhancement 0.000 0.016
  present 20(74.1%) 5(4.4%) 64(94.1%)
  absent 7(25.9%) 108(95.6%) 4(5.9%)
Arterial phase rim enhancement 0.000 0.024
  present 20(74.1%) 9(8.0%) 33(48.5%)
  absent 7(25.9%) 104(92.0%) 35(51.5%)
Slightly higher signal ring on T2WI 0.104 0.092
  present 6(22.2%) 10(8.8%) 5(7.4%)
  absent 21(77.8%) 103(91.2%) 63(92.6%)
Tumor to erector spinae muscle signal ratio on T2WI 3.54 ± 1.76 2.22 ± 1.20 4.03 ± 2.45 0.000 0.070
Target sign on DWI 0.000 0.329
  present 21(77.8%) 7(6.2%) 46(67.6%)
  absent 6(22.2%) 106(93.8%) 22(32.4%)