. 2023 Sep 21;36(6):2532–2553. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00854-5

Table 5.

Comparison of the effectiveness with different network compositions

Model	Method	DSC			PPV	SEN
		Label=1	Label=2	Average
SNG	$U - N e t$	0.830	0.817	0.823	0.879	0.872
$S N G_D 1$	$U - N e t + D 1$	0.870	0.857	0.863	0.865	0.892
Baseline	$U - N e t + D 1 + D 2$	0.877	0.866	0.872	0.909	0.893
Bottleneck	$S N G + B o t t l e n e c k$	0.851	0.845	0.848	0.830	0.804
$S N G_{ICL}$	$S N G + I C L$	0.864	0.860	0.862	0.825	0.919
$S N G_{ICL}_D 1$	$S N G + I C L + D 1$	0.877	0.866	0.872	0.909	0.893
$S N G_D 1_{ICL}$	$S N G + D 1 + I C L$	0.868	0.849	0.858	0.868	0.890
$B a s e l i n e_{ICL}$	$B a s e l i n e + I C L$	0.871	0.881	0.876	0.940	0.839
$S N G_{MFCM}$	$S N G + M F C M$	0.876	0.860	0.868	0.830	0.810
$S N G_{MFCM}_D 1$	$S N G + M F C M + D 1$	0.886	0.872	0.879	0.967	0.982
$S N G_D 1_{MFCM}$	$S N G + D 1 + M F C M$	0.882	0.868	0.876	0.981	0.985
$B a s e l i n e_{MFCM}$	$B a s e l i n e + M F C M$	0.906	0.895	0.900	0.973	0.978
Proposed	$D M C A - G A N$	0.911	0.899	0.905	0.967	0.986