Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 6;9(10):e20764. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20764

Table 3.

Inter-rater measures’ agreement results based on different measurement methods on disc height.

Level N SD Mean difference (95 % CI) 95 % LOA LOA as proportion of mean values (%)
Method 1 L1-L2 332 5.82 −1.59 (−1.89, −1.31) * −7.18, 3.80 40.9
L2-L3 332 5.52 −1.79 (−2.13, −1.48) * −7.43, 3.85 35
L3-L4 332 5.82 −1.60 (−1.88, −1.30) * −6.89, 3.69 36
L4-L5 332 5.95 −1.40 (−1.66, −1.14) * −6.03, 3.23 24
L5-S1 332 2.36 −1.12 (−1.38, −0.87) * −5.75, 3.51 46
Method 2 L1-L2 332 1.83 −0.84 (−1.05, −0.64) * −4.42, 2.75 35
L2-L3 332 1.69 −0.77 (−0.96, −0.06) * −4.08, 2.54 38
L3-L4 332 1.96 −1.04 (−1.26, −0.84) * −4.88, 2.80 40
L4-L5 332 2.10 −0.86 (−1.10, 0.65) −4.98, 3,26 46
L5-S1 332 2.29 −1.10 (−1.34, −0.86) * −5.59, 3.39 44.5
Method 3_ADH L1-L2 332 2.08 −0.97 (−1.22, −0.76) * −5.05, 3.11 37
L2-L3 332 2.17 −1.00 (−1.25, −0.79) * −5.25, 3.25 48
L3-L4 332 2.41 −1.23 (−1.51, −0.99) * −5.95, 3.49 45
L4-L5 332 2.76 −1.15 (−1.45, −0.87) * −6.56, 4.26 35
L5-S1 332 2.93 −1.16 (−1.48, −0.83) * −6.90, 4.58 33
Method 3_PDH L1-L2 332 2.27 −0.70 (−0.95, −0.49) * −5.15, 3.75 63
L2-L3 332 1.67 −0.55 (−0.72, −0.37) * −3.82, 2.72 65
L3-L4 332 1.92 −0.84 (−1.06, −0.65) * −4.60, 2.92 72
L4-L5 332 2.29 −0.58 (−0.82, −0.33) * −5.07, 3.91 75
L5-S1 332 2.34 −1.06 (−1.33, −0.81) * −5.65, 3.53 72
Method 4 L1-L2 332 2.99 −1.37 (−1.73, −1.05) * −7.23, 4.49 73
L2-L3 332 2.88 −1.52 (−1.54, −1.22) * −7.16, 4.12 80
L3-L4 332 2.53 −1.27 (−1.55, −1.02) * −6.23, 3.69 67
L4-L5 332 2.76 −1.14 (−1.46, −0.87) * −6.55, 4.27 66
Method 5_ADML L1-L2 332 3.77 −1.70 (−2.08, −1.26) * −9.09, 5.69 67
L2-L3 332 4.68 −1.17 (−1.68, −0.68) * −10.34, 8.00 78
L3-L4 332 3.83 −1.72 (−2.14, −1.31) * −9.23, 5.79 80
L4-L5 332 5.31 −1.63 (−2.30, −1.09) * −11.10, 8.78 77
L5-S1 332 4.83 −1.04 (−1.57, 0.51) −10.51, 8.43 66
Method 5_PDML L1-L2 332 2.76 −0.13 (−0.44, −0.18) * −5.53, 5.28 84
L2-L3 332 0.77 −0.28 (−0.36, −0.21) * −1.79, 1.23 86.5
L3-L4 332 3.15 −1.27 (−1.58, −0.92) * −7.44, 4.90 64.9
L4-L5 332 6.01 −1.62 (−2.25, −0.91) * −13.40, 10.16 84
L5-S1 332 2.13 −0.49 (−0.72, −0.26) * −4.66, 3.68 89
Method 6 L1-L2 332 1.98 −1.09 (−1.30, −0.87) * −4.97, 2.79 46.1
L2-L3 332 1.98 −1.11 (−1.32, −0.91) * −0.10, 0.06 45.7
L3-L4 332 2.10 −1.22 (−1.46, −1.01) * −5.34, 2.90 35
L4-L5 332 2.02 −1.04 (−1.27, −0.84) * −5.00, 2.92 40
L5-S1 332 2.21 −1.11 (−1.34, −0.87) * −5.44, 3.22 45
Method 7 L1-L2 332 0.22 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.08, 0.08 49.3
L2-L3 332 0.10 0.01 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.03, 0.05 28.6
L3-L4 332 0.20 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.04, 0.04 27.6
L4-L5 332 0.14 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.10, 0.10 44.5
L5-S1 332 0.07 0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) −0.14, 0.14 40
Method 8 L1-L2 332 0.12 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.08, 0.08 44.5
L2-L3 332 0.06 0.01 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.03, 0.05 28.6
L3-L4 332 0.10 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.04, 0.04 27.6
L4-L5 332 0.08 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) * −0.10, 0.10 44.5

N: number of levels; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence intervals; LOA: Limits of Agreement; ADH: anterior disc height; PDH: posterior disc height; ADML: anterior disc material length; PDML: posterior disc material length; * Bias was considered present if the 95 % CI did not include zero. The proportion lower than 50 % was regarded as an acceptable precision.