Table 4.
Estimates of the ESP model for Y1 and Y2.
Variable | Cooperative membership (CM) |
Y1 = 1 |
Y1 = 0 |
Cooperative membership (CM) |
Y2 = 1 |
Y2 = 0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef.(S.E.) | Coef. (S.E.) | Coef. (S.E.) | Coef. (S.E.) | Coef. (S.E.) | Coef. (S.E.) | |
Gender(se) | 0.451***(0.159) | −0.294(0.336) | −0.0897(0.173) | 0.440***(0.16) | 0.211(0.251) | −0.0446(0.166) |
Age (ag) | 0.05 (0.0424) | 0.124*(0.0713) | 0.100**(0.0509) | 0.0497(0.0424) | 0.0646(0.06) | 0.0903*(0.0526) |
Square of age (ag2) | −0.000516*(0.000403) | −0.00097(0.000711) | −0.000942**(0.000463) | −0.000509(0.000403) | −0.000615(0.000588) | −0.000950*(0.000492) |
Education (edu) | 0.333***(0.0669) | 0.155(0.129) | −0.121(0.1) | 0.348***(0.0668) | 0.118(0.106) | 0.0048(0.102) |
Proportion of household farmers(fa) | 0.0946(.) | 0.281(0.372) | −0.139(0.275) | 0.135(0.227) | 0.574*(0.304) | −0.148(0.274) |
Operating cultivated land area (mu)(lad) | 0.00212***(0.000761) | −0.000206(0.000311) | 0.0126(0.0137) | 0.00223***(0.000794) | 0.00027(0.000311) | 0.000146(0.00249) |
Income (inc) | 0.0791(0.081) | −0.112(0.116) | 0.417***(0.121) | 0.0779(0.0812) | 0.0386(0.0981) | 0.286***(0.102) |
Difficulty of bank loan(loa) | 0.108(0.0768) | 0.0623(0.139) | 0.518***(0.102) | 0.101(0.0771) | −0.0875(0.116) | 0.304***(0.0845) |
Social relationship (sr) | −0.0645(0.171) | 0.615**(0.286) | −0.0814(0.235) | −0.0216(0.169) | 0.774***(0.226) | −0.105(0.227) |
Cognition of green product benefits (cog) | 0.233*(0.121) | 0.264(0.197) | −0.135(0.148) | 0.251**(0.12) | 0.143(0.165) | −0.155(0.141) |
Share of villagers in co-operatives (RPC) | 0.936***(0.134) | 0.894***(0.136) | ||||
Constant | −3.744***(0.134) | −3.498* (2.121) | −4.119***(1.513) | −3.783***(1.137) | −2.639(1.777) | −3.579**(1.485) |
0.243 | 0.333 | 0.628* | ||||
−0.632** | 0.316 | −0.371 | ||||
LR test of indep. eqns. (rho1 = rho0 = 0):chi2(2) = 4.23; Prob > chi2 = 0.1206 | LR test of indep. eqns. (rho1 = rho0 = 0):chi2(2) = 5.18; Prob > chi2 = 0.0751 | |||||
Log likelihood = −606.74342; Wald chi2(11) = 178.48 | Log likelihood = −685.9897; Wald chi2(11) = 178.83 |
Notes: ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1 %, 5 %, and 10 % levels, respectively.