| Methods |
Participants were selected at the children's hospital in Hamburg, Germany. Patients were diagnosed with pneumonia based on chest X‐ray. The study compared erythromycin therapy with amoxycillin therapy. The duration of the study was not specified, nor were the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although the treatment allocation was randomised, there was no blinding of the outcome assessor or the participant. Baseline measurements were recorded using temperature, full blood examination, chest X‐ray and cough presence. Outcome measures were noted over 10 days and were not well described, with 'clinical improvement' being documented without any clear definition |
| Participants |
|
| Interventions |
|
| Outcomes |
Clinical presentations |
| Notes |
— |
| Risk of bias |
| Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
A list of randomised numbers was used to allocate participants into treatment groups |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
No mention of allocation concealment |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
No blinding of participants or outcome assessors |
| Follow‐up?
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
No description of losses to follow‐up was included in the paper |
| Reporting of participants by allocation group?
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Unclear mention of withdrawals or drop‐outs |