Florez 2008.
Methods | Randomised controlled open study | |
Participants | 102 participants; mean age 46.7 years; 85% male; 82% only elementary school education; 69% married; 48% employed; 73% reporting more than 700 ethanol grams per week; OCDS score 17 on average Inclusion criteria: meeting ICD‐10 criteria for alcohol dependence (WHO 1992); having an ethanol intake of at least 210 grams per week for men and 140 grams per week for women assessed with the EuropASI (Kokkevi 1995) Exclusion criteria: younger than 18 or older than 65 years of age; current diagnosis of dependence or abuse of other substances except nicotine; current psychiatric diagnosis other than personality disorders; any clinically significant medical condition that in the opinion of the researchers would adversely affect safety or study participation; inability to give full informed consent; not speaking Spanish or Galician; clinical history of mental retardation; pregnancy or breast‐feeding; not having a significant other to provide accurate daily alcohol‐related information to researchers |
|
Interventions | (1) Topiramate, 51 participants; (2) naltrexone, 51 participants Drug dose: topiramate up to 200 to 400 mg/d; naltrexone 50 mg/d All participants received individualised psychological therapy based on Relapse Prevention Model (Carroll 1996 b) Setting: outpatient Duration: six months. Country of origin: Spain |
|
Outcomes | Efficacy was defined according to the following categories:
Participants in groups three, four and five and dropouts were considered as relapsed |
|
Notes | For those who needed detoxification, treatment with clorazepate was used. Treatment with naltrexone or topiramate was started after detoxification was completed | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation carried out through a computer programme |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Open study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data on all participants analysed on an intent–to‐treat basis. Dropouts assumed to have resumed heavy drinking on the day after their last contact |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) all outcomes | High risk | Unblinded study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) subjective | High risk | Unblinded study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) objective | Low risk | Outcome measurement not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding |