Florez 2011.
Methods | Randomised controlled open study | |
Participants | 182 participants; mean age 47.7 years; 85% male; 87% only elementary school education; 62% married; 46% employed; 74% reporting more than 700 ethanol grams per week; OCDS score 18 on average Inclusion criteria: meeting ICD‐10 criteria for alcohol dependence; having an ethanol intake, during the past six months before detoxification, of at least 210 g/wk for men and 140 g/wk for women, assessed with the EuropASI and the Alcohol Timeline Followback; expressing a desire to stop drinking alcohol Exclusion criteria: younger than 18 or older than 65 years of age; current diagnosis of dependence or abuse of other substances except nicotine assessed with the EuropASI and a urine drug screen; current psychiatric diagnosis other than personality disorders assessed with the EuropASI; any clinically significant medical condition that in the opinion of the researchers would adversely affect safety or study participation assessed with the EuropASI; inability to give full informed consent; clinical history of mental retardation; pregnancy or breast‐feeding; not having a significant other to provide accurate daily alcohol‐related information to researchers |
|
Interventions | (1) Topiramate, 91 participants; (2) naltrexone, 91 participants Drug dose: topiramate up to 200 to 400 mg/d; naltrexone 50 mg/d All participants received weekly psychological therapy based on BRENDA model (Volpicelli 2001) Setting: outpatient Duration: six months. Country of origin: Spain |
|
Outcomes | Efficacy was defined according to the following categories:
The following variables were also used: number of heavy drinking days; percentage of days abstinent during previous three months; total drinking days during previous three months; days to first drink; drinks per drinking day Participants in groups three, four and five and dropouts were considered relapsed |
|
Notes | All participants were detoxified before starting treatment with naltrexone or topiramate | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation stated. No further information available from the study |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Unblinded study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data on all participants analysed on an intent–to‐treat basis. Dropouts assumed to have resumed heavy drinking on the day after their last contact |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) all outcomes | High risk | Unblinded study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) subjective | High risk | Unblinded study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) objective | Low risk | Outcome measurement not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding |