Table 3. Comparison of FA and MD values between the 2 groups.
ROI | Parameter | NEC group (n=30) | Control group (n=40) | t or Z value | P value | Q value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC | FA | 0.44±0.07 | 0.62±0.07 | −8.214 | <0.001* | 0.02** |
MD | 1.102±0.076 | 1.074±0.080 | −1.482 | 0.143 | 0.26 | |
LN | FA | 0.09±0.02 | 0.14±0.04 | −4.932 | <0.001* | 0.01** |
MD | 1.059±0.112 | 0.999±0.108 | 2.246 | 0.028* | 0.093** | |
CN | FA | 0.05±0.02 | 0.06±0.02 | −1.908 | 0.063 | 0.14 |
MD | 1.148±0.133 | 1.114±0.155 | −0.984 | 0.329 | 0.47 | |
TH | FA | 0.16±0.02 | 0.17±0.04 | −0.792 | 0.443 | 0.554 |
MD | 1.062±0.084 | 1.045±0.084 | −0.826 | 0.412 | 0.549 | |
FWM | FA | 0.06±0.02 | 0.08±0.03 | −2.965 | 0.005* | 0.02** |
MD | 1.194±0.115 | 1.138±0.108 | −2.090 | 0.040* | 0.114 | |
PWM | FA | 0.10±0.03 | 0.11±0.04 | −0.691 | 0.493 | 0.548 |
MD | 1.187±0.236 | 1.053±0.538 | −1.278 | 0.209 | 0.322 | |
OWM | FA | 0.11±0.03 | 0.11±0.03 | −0.176 | 0.861 | 0.861 |
MD | 1.299±0.251 | 1.218±0.216 | 1.453 | 0.151 | 0.252 | |
CERE | FA | 0.09±0.02 | 0.11±0.03 | −1.539 | 0.131 | 0.262 |
MD | 0.944±0.273 | 0.912±0.962 | −0.692 | 0.492 | 0.579 | |
PLIC | FA | 0.37 (0.31–0.48) | 0.56 (0.52–0.61) | −5.071 | <0.001* | 0.01** |
MD | 1.182±0.116 | 1.017±0.179 | 4.394 | <0.001* | 0.005** | |
CP | FA | 0.13 (0.10–0.17) | 0.16 (0.14–0.18) | −1.987 | 0.047* | 0.1175 |
MD | 1.083±0.121 | 1.072±0.277 | 0.229 | 0.820 | 0.863 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or median (range). The NEC group had significantly lower FA values for the SCC (P<0.001), PLIC (P<0.001), LN (P<0.001), FWM (P=0.005), and CP (P=0.047). *, P value <0.05; **, Q value <0.1. FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; ROI, region of interest; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; SCC, splenium of the corpus callosum; LN, lentiform nucleus; CN, caudate nucleus; TH, thalamus; FWM, frontal white matter; PWM, parietal white matter; OWM, occipital white matter; CERE, cerebellum; PLIC, posterior limbs of the internal capsule; CP, cerebral peduncle; SD, standard deviation.