Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 5;13(10):7156–7169. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-396

Table 3. Comparison of MRI features between mass-forming ICC and atypical HCC.

Variables Mass-forming ICC (n=53) Atypical HCC (n=76) χ2/t P value
Shape 1.772 0.412
   Irregular 32 (60.4) 37 (48.7)
   Lobulated 9 (17.0) 18 (23.7)
   Globular 12 (22.6) 21 (27.6)
Location
   Right liver lobe 36 (67.9) 54 (71.1) 0.439 0.803
   Left liver lobe 11 (20.8) 16 (21.1)
   Caudate lobe 6 (11.3) 6 (7.9)
Maximum diameter (mm) 29.1±5.7 31.1±5.9 1.932 0.056
Central hyperintensity on T2WI 21 (39.6) 17 (22.4) 4.473 0.034
Central hypointensity on T2WI 36 (67.9) 34 (44.7) 6.765 0.009
Multifocal hyperintensity on T2WI 5 (9.4) 20 (26.3) 5.696 0.017
Nodule in nodule 6 (11.3) 11 (14.5) 0.271 0.602
Mosaic sign 11 (20.8) 21 (27.6) 0.792 0.374
Rim APHE 27 (50.9) 31 (40.8) 1.301 0.254
Peripheral washout 6 (11.3) 8 (10.5) 0.020 0.887
Peripheral enhancement 41 (77.4) 62 (81.6) 0.346 0.557
Capsule sign 3 (5.7) 22 (28.9) 10.838 0.001
Targetoid sign 46 (86.8) 8 (10.5)
   Targetoid sign on HBP 40 (75.5) 7 (9.2) 59.195 <0.001
   Targetoid restriction on DWI 44 (83.0) 8 (10.5) 68.198 <0.001

Data are number of patients (percentage) or mean ± standard deviation. The maximum diameter comparisons were performed using the independent samples t-test. Except where noted, data were compared using the χ2 test. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; APHE, arterial phase hyperenhancement; HBP, hepatobiliary phase; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging.