Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 17;13(10):6656–6667. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-329

Table 2. Inter-session and intra-examiner reliability and repeatability for the RUSI bilateral and simultaneous diaphragm thickness analysis using the designed orthosis during relaxed breathing.

RUSI thickness RUSI diaphragm thickness (cm), mean ± SD (95% CI) ICC (95% CI) SEM MDC P value
Baseline After 1 week
Right diaphragm
   Tins 0.172±0.050 (0.157–0.187) 0.173±0.050 (0.158–0.188) 0.990 (0.981–0.994) 0.005 0.013 0.437#
   Texp 0.148±0.045 (0.134–0.161) 0.149±0.043 (0.136–0.162) 0.990 (0.983–0.995) 0.004 0.012 0.381
   Tins − Texp 0.024±0.035 (0.013–0.034) 0.024±0.035 (0.013–0.034) 0.985 (0.973–0.992) 0.004 0.011 0.946#
Left diaphragm
   Tins 0.187±0.053 (0.171–0.203) 0.185±0.051 (0.170–0.201) 0.987 (0.976–0.993) 0.005 0.016 0.879
   Texp 0.160±0.042 (0.148–0.173) 0.160±0.039 (0.148–0.171) 0.987 (0.977–0.993) 0.004 0.012 0.871
   Tins − Texp 0.026±0.027 (0.018–0.034) 0.025±0.026 (0.017–0.033) 0.919 (0.854–0.955) 0.007 0.020 0.452

#, Student’s t-test for paired samples was used; Wilcoxon test for paired sample was used. RUSI, rehabilitative ultrasound imaging; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; SEM, standard error of measurement; MDC, minimum detectable change; Tins, maximum inspiration time; Texp, maximum expiration time.