Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 12;13(10):6363–6373. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1452

Table 2. Comparison of magnetic resonance sialography findings between patients with or without recurrence.

MRS characteristic Total (n=41) Recurrence group (n=15) Non-recurrence group (n=26) P value
Parotid volume 0.460
   Normal 23 (56.10) 10 (43.48) 13 (56.52)
   Swollen 12 (29.27) 4 (33.33) 8 (66.67)
   Atrophic 6 (14.63) 1 (16.67) 5 (83.33)
Stenosis classification 0.738
   Grade 0 23 (56.10) 8 (34.78) 15 (65.22)
   Grade 1 9 (21.95) 3 (33.33) 6 (66.67)
   Grade 2 2 (4.88) 1 (50.00) 1 (50.00)
   Grade 3 5 (12.20) 2 (40.00) 3 (60.00)
   Grade 4 2 (4.88) 1 (50.00) 1 (50.00)
Dilatation classification 0.009**
   Grade 0 2 (4.88) 0 (0.00) 2 (100.00)
   Grade 1 18 (43.90) 3 (16.67) 15 (83.33)
   Grade 2 13 (31.71) 7 (53.85) 6 (46.15)
   Grade 3 8 (19.51) 5 (62.50) 3 (37.50)
Dilatation length 0.043*
   <1/3 the main duct 16 (41.03) 5 (31.25) 11 (68.75)
   1/3–<1/2 4 (10.26) 0 (0.00) 4 (100.00)
   1/2–2/3 11 (28.20) 4 (36.36) 7 (63.64)
   >2/3 8 (20.51) 6 (75.00) 2 (25.00)
Location of dilatation 0.621
   Distal 10 (25.64) 4 (40.00) 6 (60.00)
   Middle 19 (48.72) 6 (31.58) 13 (68.42)
   Proximal 10 (25.64) 5 (50.00) 5 (50.00)
Branch duct dilatation 0.017*
   Absent 21 (51.22) 4 (19.05) 17 (80.95)
   Present 20 (48.78) 11 (55.00) 9 (45.00)
Diameter of branch duct (mm) 2.2±0.5 2.2±0.6 2.1±0.5 0.723

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01. MRS, magnetic resonance sialography.